ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331  
Old 04-27-2018, 07:08 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,390
Thanks: 23,082
Thanked 5,943 Times in 3,380 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty46953 View Post
The basement is flooding, perhaps Omaha is there poking his mother ...
fify
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 04-27-2018, 07:20 AM
njcoltfan njcoltfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,551
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 925 Times in 540 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 View Post
Not sure where Colts stand currently with the 89% of cap that must be spent over a 4 year period. That being said with last years draft, this years draft and the minor FA signings over two years Ballard will have a much better idea as to where he should be investing FA monies and will actually be forced to over the course of the next two off seasons. While I would have liked that difference maker on defense I'm more comfortable with someone coming to my team that is going to be hungry and working their way to the big payday than someone who just got a big payday. I've seen what FA o-linemen did to Luck for 5 years, worked out swell for Luck.
How many of them were 26yr old All Pros ??
Reply With Quote
  #333  
Old 04-27-2018, 08:37 AM
indycolts2 indycolts2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Upstate NY......yes people NYC is not NY State.
Posts: 1,644
Thanks: 111
Thanked 136 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njcoltfan View Post
How many of them were 26yr old All Pros ??
Valid point but just like we apparently dont value a G at the #6 pick why would we allow $13 - 15 million of cap to go to a guard when you can get one at so much less who is better and you have him for 5 years now.
Reply With Quote
  #334  
Old 04-27-2018, 08:40 AM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 2,065
Thanks: 329
Thanked 1,581 Times in 749 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
As ridiculous and unrealistic as that would be, I would actually like to see that on the field and the our oline flat out mauling our division d-lines every year.
I know many on here feel that the defense needs to be addressed, but the best thing for a defense is not being on the field. Drafting Hernandez and maybe Guice, could give the Colts the ability to sustain long clock eating drives.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to albany ed For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-27-2018)
  #335  
Old 04-27-2018, 08:42 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,688
Thanks: 1,724
Thanked 4,933 Times in 2,014 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albany ed View Post
I know many on here feel that the defense needs to be addressed, but the best thing for a defense is not being on the field. Drafting Hernandez and maybe Guice, could give the Colts the ability to sustain long clock eating drives.
Every year colts fans want all offense


It is a sickness
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 04-27-2018, 08:52 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,290
Thanks: 353
Thanked 966 Times in 532 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
Every year colts fans want all offense


It is a sickness
Apparently. The team does not have a single starting quality LB on the roster, no true pass rusher, and big questions in the secondary and people still want more offense

Last edited by rm1369; 04-27-2018 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #337  
Old 04-27-2018, 08:59 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Assuming the Colts doctors sign off, it would be pretty amazing to come out of today with something like:

36) Landry
37) Jefferson
49) Oliver
67) Hurst

But I still expect Ballard to take Sutton at 36 or 37.
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 04-27-2018, 09:18 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,290
Thanks: 353
Thanked 966 Times in 532 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Assuming the Colts doctors sign off, it would be pretty amazing to come out of today with something like:

36) Landry
37) Jefferson
49) Oliver
67) Hurst

But I still expect Ballard to take Sutton at 36 or 37.
I’d be thrilled with that haul from day 2. I could be talked into adding another OG or OT in the 2nd, but I hope like hell they avoid RB and WR on day 2. With the state of this defense those are simply luxury picks you can’t afford right now.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
Thorgrim (04-27-2018), VeveJones007 (04-27-2018)
  #339  
Old 04-27-2018, 10:02 AM
Thorgrim's Avatar
Thorgrim Thorgrim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Satellite of Love
Posts: 3,795
Thanks: 661
Thanked 1,648 Times in 891 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
I’d be thrilled with that haul from day 2. I could be talked into adding another OG or OT in the 2nd, but I hope like hell they avoid RB and WR on day 2. With the state of this defense those are simply luxury picks you can’t afford right now.
We have so many holes to fill I’m actually fine with bpa for the most part. Obviously I don’t want them drafting an area that we aren’t hurting in but those spots are few and far between. No way this garbage roster gets fixed in one year anyway. A solid lb is essential though.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Thorgrim For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (04-27-2018)
  #340  
Old 04-27-2018, 10:12 AM
njcoltfan njcoltfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,551
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 925 Times in 540 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 View Post
Valid point but just like we apparently dont value a G at the #6 pick why would we allow $13 - 15 million of cap to go to a guard when you can get one at so much less who is better and you have him for 5 years now.
Because the Colts could have gotten a dynamic impact player at #6, and gotten a starting guard at #36 or #37. Then your OL would be set for years, and the Colts would have the cornerstone to build the defense around, all without wasting a pick. JMO though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.