ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331  
Old 04-05-2022, 12:03 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I know Hines, Willis, and Pinter were Day 3 picks. Is there a reason you included them in something you labeled "2nd day picks"?
Second and third round are on the second day of the draft everything else is on the third day of the draft. Either way they’re not first rounders there later in the draft and they still contribute to the team
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 04-05-2022, 06:11 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,608
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,771 Times in 998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
It wouldn’t be hard for them to understand if Ballard did it. Then it would become the correct thing to do and make perfect sense. It’s the questioning that’s the issue.

The only fault in your logic is the “if he wants to try to make a run at a SB this year”. I honestly don’t think he does, at least not at the expense of future years. He wants a SB but I think he believes in the idea of being a really good team for as long as possible and good things will happen. It is certainly possible to win a SB that way, but I don’t think it’s the correct way to go about it. People consistently bring up Polian in defense of Ballard’s methods, but I personally see it as an indictment instead. Polian had, IMO, the best QB to ever play the game and won one SB. They were consistently really, really good though. They could have been less consistent and had higher peaks to go with the lower valleys. Now imagine that Ballard has / is building the same thing without that level of QB. He won’t mortgage the future for a shot now. Not unless Irsay dictates it. According to reports he was willing to miss on Ryan to give a 4th instead of a 3rd. He’ll win every transaction, but still lose (what is for me) the big picture.
Well said. That Ballard doesn't want to make any changes to his process to make a run at the Super Bowl is the point I was trying to make, and in all likelihood by the time he's able to adequately fill all of these gaping holes in the roster father time will have caught up with Ryan. Sad thing is he wouldn't have to "mortgage the future" to bring in some guys. I'm too lazy to look it up, but someone posted a snippet from someone who covers the Colts saying that he could free up ~$40M in cap space by converting salaries to signing bonuses on players he'll probably want to extend when they get to the final year of their contracts anyway (Buckner was one of them).

Also, I couldn't agree more with your final sentence. Ballard seems more concerned with making sure he gets his pre-determined value for every transaction than he does with making the team better, and in doing so misses on the big picture.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IndyNorm For This Useful Post:
smitty46953 (04-05-2022)
  #333  
Old 04-05-2022, 08:32 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 770
Thanked 2,642 Times in 1,242 Posts
Default

I’m really going to sour on Ballard if he doesn’t address wide receiver in free agency. I have this nagging fear that he thinks he can adequately fill the position in the draft.

If he does think that, he’s full of shit. This roster badly needs an experienced receiver across from MPJ.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hoopsdoc For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (04-05-2022)
  #334  
Old 04-05-2022, 10:07 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
Well said. That Ballard doesn't want to make any changes to his process to make a run at the Super Bowl is the point I was trying to make, and in all likelihood by the time he's able to adequately fill all of these gaping holes in the roster father time will have caught up with Ryan. Sad thing is he wouldn't have to "mortgage the future" to bring in some guys. I'm too lazy to look it up, but someone posted a snippet from someone who covers the Colts saying that he could free up ~$40M in cap space by converting salaries to signing bonuses on players he'll probably want to extend when they get to the final year of their contracts anyway (Buckner was one of them).

Also, I couldn't agree more with your final sentence. Ballard seems more concerned with making sure he gets his pre-determined value for every transaction than he does with making the team better, and in doing so misses on the big picture.
Wow, maybe you need to send Ballard your resume.
Reply With Quote
  #335  
Old 04-06-2022, 12:19 AM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,608
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,771 Times in 998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
Wow, maybe you need to send Ballard your resume.
Great response.
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 04-06-2022, 06:32 AM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
Great response.
Thanks. Claiming someone who has spent his adult life in football has less perspective on his job than someone like me, who can only get info on the interweb is a bit silly.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Ironshaft (04-06-2022)
  #337  
Old 04-06-2022, 06:57 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 338
Thanked 919 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
Thanks. Claiming someone who has spent his adult life in football has less perspective on his job than someone like me, who can only get info on the interweb is a bit silly.
I guess this explains why you simply agree with whatever Ballard does. Were you the same with Grigson? Did his title and experience put him beyond question as well?
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 04-06-2022, 11:30 AM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 8,198
Thanks: 2,640
Thanked 3,645 Times in 2,167 Posts
Default

Buffalo re-signed Diggs for 4 years/$96M/$70M guaranteed. He 'took a discount" so he could keep playing with Allen. I cannot imagine the Colts paying a WR that type of money.

Stephen Holder has put out on Twitter that agents are saying that Ballard is being "too cheap". So that's out there now.

Just FYI. Have a good day everyone.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
  #339  
Old 04-06-2022, 12:16 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,053
Thanks: 2,805
Thanked 2,991 Times in 1,588 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
Campbell RAS - 9.76
Strachan RAS - 9.22
Patmon RAS - 8.44
Pittman RAS - 8.24
Pascal RAS - 8.18
Fountain RAS - 8.01
Cain RAS - 6.48
Bell RAS - 2.72

You can argue that Bell is a playmaker regardless of his athletic ability, but he definitely doesn’t fit the mold for what Ballard tends to draft.
Christian Watson RAS - 9.98

Last edited by YDFL Commish; 04-06-2022 at 12:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
rm1369 (04-06-2022)
  #340  
Old 04-06-2022, 02:08 PM
apballin apballin is online now
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,155
Thanks: 2,254
Thanked 1,417 Times in 784 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brylok View Post
Buffalo re-signed Diggs for 4 years/$96M/$70M guaranteed. He 'took a discount" so he could keep playing with Allen. I cannot imagine the Colts paying a WR that type of money.

Stephen Holder has put out on Twitter that agents are saying that Ballard is being "too cheap". So that's out there now.

Just FYI. Have a good day everyone.
Fuck the agents, maybe their players are wanting “too dam much”

Stick to your guns Ballard, if a guy doesn’t wanna be here fuck them

If you wanna win, come play for the shoe if not go get paid and be a loser
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.