ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

View Poll Results: Who do you think will be the QB for 2022
Wentz 10 27.03%
Ehlinger 3 8.11%
Draft. Who and what round 2 5.41%
Wilson What are you trading 0 0%
Rogers What are you trading 0 0%
Watson What are you trading 1 2.70%
Tribusky 8 21.62%
Bridgewater 1 2.70%
Jimmy G What are you trading 3 8.11%
Other 9 24.32%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 03-09-2022, 08:04 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,034
Thanks: 2,778
Thanked 2,968 Times in 1,573 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
I didnt think they would be able to really move off of wentz easily, I thought we wouldnt be able to trade him and would play him by default or trade and eat salary making it a bit harder to sign whoever is our next QB.

Well.. since they were able to get rid of wentz with no money implications ballard seems to have a better situation to play with. I would hazard a guess that ballard does not want to trade any more picks because he loves his picks and got burnt last time around, this is especially relevant given the quality of QBs available. Therefore I think he will sign one of the FAs to a 2 year deal and try to draft our long term solution in the next two years, probably next years draft.

I will say trubisky. They will overpay a bit for a shorter term deal.
I agree. Stopgap it for a season or 2 and draft the guy you believe in.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 03-09-2022, 08:36 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,606
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,771 Times in 998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
but at what cost?


i don't think he is worth what they will want for him
Yeah, considering what we're getting for Wentz Jimmy G might be out of Ballard's price range.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 03-09-2022, 09:23 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,151
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 1,414 Times in 782 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
Yeah, considering what we're getting for Wentz Jimmy G might be out of Ballard's price range.
What do think they’re asking for a QB they don’t want anymore coming off surgery???

We can basically send the Washington picks to them and it’s an even swap
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 03-11-2022, 10:38 AM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,873
Thanks: 601
Thanked 2,286 Times in 1,059 Posts
Default

So apparently they are targeting Carr? I didn't see but I guess McAfee said that on his show yesterday.

I've read some Raiders fans sweating bullets over trading Carr. Bringing up how McDaniels went to Denver and immediately traded Cutler.

From LV's perspective... there's two ways to speculate I suppose... Either they have to have Carr because the division is loaded at QB and no bad teams. Or McDaniels is thinking longer term, takes a haul for Carr, and builds from there.

Wishful thinking on my part, I'm sure.

Last edited by ChaosTheory; 03-11-2022 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 03-11-2022, 03:58 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,151
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 1,414 Times in 782 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosTheory View Post
So apparently they are targeting Carr? I didn't see but I guess McAfee said that on his show yesterday.

I've read some Raiders fans sweating bullets over trading Carr. Bringing up how McDaniels went to Denver and immediately traded Cutler.

From LV's perspective... there's two ways to speculate I suppose... Either they have to have Carr because the division is loaded at QB and no bad teams. Or McDaniels is thinking longer term, takes a haul for Carr, and builds from there.

Wishful thinking on my part, I'm sure.
I’m fine with Carr, but what’s the cost?

I mean if it’s a 3rd for Jimmy vs a Twos 2nd for Carr I’d still roll with Jimmy
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:19 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,294
Thanks: 9,440
Thanked 5,622 Times in 3,071 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
but at what cost?


i don't think he is worth what they will want for him
He sure as hell isn't.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:35 PM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,800
Thanks: 276
Thanked 1,253 Times in 593 Posts
Default

Bottom line, I don't see any of the possible 2022 QBs being of SB level, so I've no wish to see the Colts trade for one of them. Roll with a free agent, but don't give up any more players or draft picks to get less than a stud QB.
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to albany ed For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (03-11-2022), Oldcolt (03-11-2022)
  #88  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:49 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,294
Thanks: 9,440
Thanked 5,622 Times in 3,071 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apballin View Post
What do think they’re asking for a QB they don’t want anymore coming off surgery???

We can basically send the Washington picks to them and it’s an even swap
No way I would send the Washington picks for Jimmy G. Sign a free agent or go with a draft pick.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (03-11-2022)
  #89  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:50 PM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,873
Thanks: 601
Thanked 2,286 Times in 1,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apballin View Post
I’m fine with Carr, but what’s the cost?

I mean if it’s a 3rd for Jimmy vs a Twos 2nd for Carr I’d still roll with Jimmy
Well, that's the question. This is all assuming he's even actually on the market. I don't like Garoppolo like some of you guys do. On-the-field reasons are enough, but the fact that he's only started 19 out of a possible 80 games for SF is pretty scary. That said; I can't imagine Garoppolo going for a 3rd with this many teams in play.

Anyway, yeah, Carr would probably cost something that would sting. Of course, there's a lot of room between the two 3rd's that Wentz pulled and the truckload that Wilson pulled. I couldn't even guess Carr's cost other than to say it'll be in between Wentz and Wilson.

Carr is not a top-of-the-line guy, but he's a lot better than Wentz. And notably, compared to Wentz, his accuracy and panic-level are desirable. As bad as things ended up for us... how close was our 9-win season to a 10-, 11-, 12-win season even with Wentz?
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 03-11-2022, 06:01 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,151
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 1,414 Times in 782 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike View Post
No way I would send the Washington picks for Jimmy G. Sign a free agent or go with a draft pick.
What free agent?

I don’t want any of the listed free agents they’re all just Wentz all over again yes we’d get to keep the picks but that’s not gonna matter unless we figure out the QB
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.