ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2020, 10:18 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,427
Thanks: 117
Thanked 2,066 Times in 1,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
Hmmm, let’s see.....Ballard or Dam? That’s a tough one.

This is another classic Ballard guy. Extremely smart, extremely productive, durable and reliable.

I did not realize that he ran the fastest 40 of any running back.
I hope he proves me wrong, but he has a serious fumbling problem and a lot of mileage on him already. Also, I find it funny that some here always bring up my "obsession" with 40 times and you're using a 40 time as justification for this pick. Edwards-Helaire ran a 4.6 and I'd've taken him over Taylor in a heartbeat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironshaft View Post
Seriously? A waste of a 2nd.

So, you are betting right now that Ballard and his staff have selected Ron Dayne part 2? Trent Richardson the 2nd? That the pick was completely wasted.

Dang, why don't you have a job with an NFL team? Able to predict the future!
They took a Day 3 guy at 41 is what I'm saying. Again, I hope he proves me wrong, but a RB with a fumbling problem and high mileage is like a WR who can't catch or run routes. Why would I care how good the positives are at that point?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2020, 10:20 PM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,259
Thanks: 2,593
Thanked 3,181 Times in 1,835 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
They took a Day 3 guy at 41 is what I'm saying. Again, I hope he proves me wrong, but a RB with a fumbling problem and high mileage is like a WR who can't catch or run routes. Why would I care how good the positives are at that point?
This is seriously one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever seen you say.

A Day 3 guy? On what planet?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nate505 For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-24-2020)
  #3  
Old 04-24-2020, 10:25 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate505 View Post
This is seriously one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever seen you say.

A Day 3 guy? On what planet?
Apparently Ballard has a different view of “value”, than what the fans think. The big difference is that many of us will not lose our jobs based on the Colts draft
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2020, 10:28 PM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,259
Thanks: 2,593
Thanked 3,181 Times in 1,835 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
Apparently Ballard has a different view of “value”, than what the fans think. The big difference is that many of us will not lose our jobs based on the Colts draft
I get people not liking the pick. But I can't honestly believe most fans having the guy as a 3rd day pick.

Like I don't think Herbert is anything to write home about, but he was still a Day 1 pick to me, and it seemed fairly obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2020, 10:33 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,427
Thanks: 117
Thanked 2,066 Times in 1,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate505 View Post
This is seriously one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever seen you say.

A Day 3 guy? On what planet?
Tiki Barber was a good RB who almost got cut because of fumble issues. He fixed it, and became one of the top 5 RBs in the NFL for several years. Hopefully Taylor can do the same, but a RB with fumble problems and high mileage is like a WR who can't catch or run routes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2020, 10:35 AM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,606
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,771 Times in 998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate505 View Post
This is seriously one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever seen you say.

A Day 3 guy? On what planet?
That might be the dumbest thing Dam has said since Pagano was fired. I would have rather had seen us draft Delpit or OL/DL there and also think Dobbins will make a better NFL RB (although another RB went ahead of Dobbins as well, so maybe there's some issues there that I'm not seeing). But Taylor was clearly a great college RB, had a hell of a 40 time (especially with his size), and worth a 2nd round pick. His fumbling is definitely a concern, but our coaches must think they can fix that (could be wrong, but didn't Mack have fumbling issues in college as well?). If they do the Taylor could prove to be a great pick.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2020, 10:39 AM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,350
Thanks: 2,645
Thanked 2,553 Times in 1,144 Posts
Default

I like the Taylor pick a lot because I think it shows that Ballard does not plan on spending big money on re signing running backs. You can get by easily with backs on their rookie contracts and save your money for harder positions to fill. Forward thinking and smart.

Pittman will hopefully be what they wanted in Funches. Reich really must want a big body wr

Last edited by Oldcolt; 04-25-2020 at 10:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2020, 10:43 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 338
Thanked 919 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
I like the Taylor pick a lot because I think it shows that Ballard does not plan on spending big money on re signing running backs. You can get by easily with backs on their rookie contracts and save your money for harder positions to fill. Forward thinking and smart.
Agreed. I think you’d be smart to never give a RB a second contract. Almost never works out these days.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-25-2020, 11:47 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,427
Thanks: 117
Thanked 2,066 Times in 1,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
That might be the dumbest thing Dam has said since Pagano was fired. I would have rather had seen us draft Delpit or OL/DL there and also think Dobbins will make a better NFL RB (although another RB went ahead of Dobbins as well, so maybe there's some issues there that I'm not seeing). But Taylor was clearly a great college RB, had a hell of a 40 time (especially with his size), and worth a 2nd round pick. His fumbling is definitely a concern, but our coaches must think they can fix that (could be wrong, but didn't Mack have fumbling issues in college as well?). If they do the Taylor could prove to be a great pick.
What day was Mack drafted on? Taylor's issues are too big to have drafted him as high as he was drafted in my opinion. You can mindlessly applaud the pick if you'd like, I'm not going to like this pick because I see Taylor in the same vein as a WR who has a "lot of talent", but can't catch or run routes. Obviously the Colts invested a lot in Taylor, so I hope the coaches can fix his issues and turn him into a top end RB, but there's a lot to be nervous about there, and as you said, the Colts could've gotten a better player in Grant Delpit. Why not just do that if you're going to waste draft capital moving up?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2020, 12:08 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 769
Thanked 2,641 Times in 1,242 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
What day was Mack drafted on? Taylor's issues are too big to have drafted him as high as he was drafted in my opinion. You can mindlessly applaud the pick if you'd like, I'm not going to like this pick because I see Taylor in the same vein as a WR who has a "lot of talent", but can't catch or run routes. Obviously the Colts invested a lot in Taylor, so I hope the coaches can fix his issues and turn him into a top end RB, but there's a lot to be nervous about there, and as you said, the Colts could've gotten a better player in Grant Delpit. Why not just do that if you're going to waste draft capital moving up?
Wait, you’re comparing Taylor to a wide receiver who can’t catch or run routes? Really?

That’s really dumb.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hoopsdoc For This Useful Post:
Ironshaft (04-25-2020), nate505 (04-26-2020), Racehorse (04-25-2020), Spike (04-25-2020)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.