ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2021, 08:55 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,330
Thanks: 22,720
Thanked 5,898 Times in 3,349 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
I believe Ballard is still “collecting talent” not building a team.
What does this even mean?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2021, 11:46 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 350
Thanked 962 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
What does this even mean?
It means that teams who think they can compete often make different decisions than those rebuilding. Ballard makes decisions like he’s rebuilding. He isn’t filling holes to compete in a given year, he’s prioritizing the future with nearly every decision. Making so many decisions for the future has an affect on the present.

DE is a good example this season. How often do you think truly competitive teams go into the season without an edge rusher with double digit sacks? I’m not talking about for a season, I mean for a career!! I’d have to bet it’s not often. Yet, Ballard was comfortable with it. He prioritized getting his growing collection of athletes reps at DE. Long term over short term.

After drafting a 1st round DE he used his 2nd rounder on another DE that will be lucky to see the field this year. He did this instead of filling one of the other holes on the roster. Could be seen as a great move 2 years for now, but provides no help this year. Long term over short term.

Building a team is different than acquiring talent. Ballard leaves glaring holes in the roster every year. He does this because shorter term solutions have a cost he so far isn’t willing to pay. That’s more typical of a rebuilding team than a competing team.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
njcoltfan (09-27-2021), Oldcolt (09-27-2021)
  #3  
Old 09-27-2021, 12:45 PM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,138
Thanks: 937
Thanked 1,481 Times in 815 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
It means that teams who think they can compete often make different decisions than those rebuilding. Ballard makes decisions like he’s rebuilding. He isn’t filling holes to compete in a given year, he’s prioritizing the future with nearly every decision. Making so many decisions for the future has an affect on the present.

DE is a good example this season. How often do you think truly competitive teams go into the season without an edge rusher with double digit sacks? I’m not talking about for a season, I mean for a career!! I’d have to bet it’s not often. Yet, Ballard was comfortable with it. He prioritized getting his growing collection of athletes reps at DE. Long term over short term.

After drafting a 1st round DE he used his 2nd rounder on another DE that will be lucky to see the field this year. He did this instead of filling one of the other holes on the roster. Could be seen as a great move 2 years for now, but provides no help this year. Long term over short term.

Building a team is different than acquiring talent. Ballard leaves glaring holes in the roster every year. He does this because shorter term solutions have a cost he so far isn’t willing to pay. That’s more typical of a rebuilding team than a competing team.
yep, I am souring on ballard's plan. I liked it initially, but it hasnt come to fruition like it should have. Whether thats lucks retirement, too much future planning, not getting enough good FA talent , a mix of all... we are no longer trending it the right direction.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (09-27-2021), Oldcolt (09-27-2021)
  #4  
Old 09-27-2021, 01:19 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 8,427
Thanks: 2,723
Thanked 3,807 Times in 2,270 Posts
Default

We're a bottom 5 team right now. Smh
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brylok For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (09-27-2021)
  #5  
Old 09-27-2021, 01:55 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,704
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,969 Times in 1,348 Posts
Default

Most of us are old enough on this board to recognize that shit happens to everyone. It destroys the weak but the strong learn to work through and with it. I do not think we can turn this around this year (meaning a deep playoff run) with all that is going on but how this team responds the rest of the year will go a long way in determining just how much of a rebuild we will be needing. I'll watch for improvements in little things this year, not exactly where my mind was a month ago.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2021, 03:20 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,517
Thanks: 1,474
Thanked 3,876 Times in 2,165 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brylok View Post
We're a bottom 5 team right now. Smh
We’re not that bad. Rams are the new Super Bowl favorite since they beat the Bucs. And we played them tough.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
apballin (09-28-2021), CletusPyle (09-27-2021), Racehorse (09-27-2021)
  #7  
Old 09-27-2021, 04:12 PM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 2,037
Thanks: 324
Thanked 1,551 Times in 738 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
We’re not that bad. Rams are the new Super Bowl favorite since they beat the Bucs. And we played them tough.
you've got a point. In three games by the Rams, only the Colts held them under 30 points and Stafford under 300 passing yards. The offense blows right now, but the highly regarded O-line has not taken one snap with all the starters and Wentz? Even if healthy, I have my doubts, but he would be serviceable.
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2021, 07:07 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 8,527
Thanks: 2,182
Thanked 3,354 Times in 1,682 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
We’re not that bad. Rams are the new Super Bowl favorite since they beat the Bucs. And we played them tough.
They should be the SB favorite They are good
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Puck For This Useful Post:
apballin (09-28-2021), CaliColtsFan (09-28-2021)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.