
01-10-2023, 12:47 PM
|
 |
Post whore
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,351
Thanks: 9,672
Thanked 5,667 Times in 3,090 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChoppedWood
Interesting discussion on 1st Take.
Apparently Chicago has interest in Young (why you would just come off a season where your arrow seems to be pointing up behind the greatest running performance ever by a big fast powerful QB who has a cannon but nothing to really work with in the WR department and look to transform behind an undersized guy in the pocket...?). So the discussion was staying at 1 and taking Young, but getting Colts # 4 and some other parts - probably Buckner and something else + additional draft picks for Fields.
It's interesting for discussion. I am convinced that our OL is so damn bad that at least for the next couple years we're going to have to have a QB that can utilize his legs to give us any chance at being competitive (and I still expect us to suck). But, let's say we get Fields, what does he get us to, maybe 8-9, 9-8 and a possible one and done, maybe get lucky and steal a PO game in the next 3 years? Is that worth it, will he be dead on his feet 3 years from now and we'll need a new guy already anyway just when our other younger guys are starting to peak?
I like Fields, I think with a good team around him, he can be at the low end of the Josh Allen register- but I think he needs a lot of good players around him and if he has another terrible OL like he has had in Chicago (which we are), he'll eventually be wasted potential.
|
If I were the Bears organization, I would be saying the same thing whether I wanted Young or not for obvious reasons.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
|