![]() |
Ballard
I supported Ballard for the first 7 years he was gm. I finally got sick of mediocre QB play and holes in the team he was unwilling to fill because he would only use the draft to build a team. He has blown me out of the water this last year and has done everything I was pissed he never did before. Starting with actually fixing the backfield with of all things free agency and a trade for the ages. He has been a genius drafting offensive lineman, absolutely incredible what he has done there. When Luck retired I remember Ballard saying you don't need a franchise QB to win if you have a good well rounded team. Well I thought that made sense then and now we are about to put it to a real test. He took a swing with AR (unlike most of you I think that story hasn't fully played out yet-i believe that sitting behind a well run and functioning team is exactly what this young man needs) then finally found an adequate QB (again in my mind the fact that Jones and Steichen are on the same page is huge). This is such a radical change I have to give huge props to our new owners, no way they didn't have s huge hand in doing this. First time in many years I actually believe we are in the hunt. Loving this as we are finally using everything available to build. Ballard will be here a long time and I couldn't be more happy about it.
|
When ranking GMs in the NFL, I don't think Ballard is in the top 10 or even the top 20. But, that may change if the Colts can go deep in the playoffs. If they somehow got to the Show, his ranking would go way up.
|
Jones is the only starter on offense who wasn’t drafted by Ballard. I’m not sure how common that is, but i suspect it’s pretty rare.
The defense is a different story but that’s where Ballard has grown. Understanding that outside help isn’t always a bad thing. I think he either had to adjust or get fired. |
Quote:
Also, Jones was acquired by Ballard, even though he wasn't drafted by him. And prior to the Sauce Gardner trade, the overwhelming majority of this 2025 team was put together by Ballard, under the late Jim Irsay's watch. o |
Quote:
why the fuck would you waste your time posting this |
Quote:
Quote:
Because many posters here on ColtFreaks have stated numerous times how much different things are with Carlie as the new owner ...... and to me, that is revisionist history that I think needs to be rebutted in Jim's defense. So everybody here on ColtFreaks "may know this", but they don't always act like they know it ...... if Jim were still alive today, the Colts would be right where they are now atop the AFC South with a record of 7-2. o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Carlie is being that forthright to the world, imagine her demeanor behind closed doors. |
He is mediocre at best....but he is made of teflon!
This trade gives him a fresh coating......:D |
Quote:
The Colts would still be 7-2 and atop that AFC South, with or without Sauce. Daniel Jones was acquired under Jim's watch, and that has been the most significant change in the Colts this season. Like yourself, I won't come down on Ballard if Sauce plays badly or breaks his ankle 5 plays into his Colts career, but the addition of Jones was made while Jim was still the owner. o |
Quote:
Now you're just assuming things to fit your own narrative. |
Quote:
|
I think what you say C&O stretches credulity. Yes, technically it was still Jims regime when Jones was signed. Two months before he died of a chronic illness. An illness that had kept him from speaking to the media for over a year. He had nothing to say about DJ publicly when he was signed. He was a very sick man. Reports have said that Carlie was making the decisions for the last year. You actually think it is totally coincidence that after years of doing things the exact same way, including two straight years of having AR starting (or more appropriately thrown to the wolves), Jim dies (when you are dead it doesn't matter one bit what you thought when you are alive for any of us) and all of a sudden the team sits AR, magically wins the first game of the year in a decade and makes a totally unBallard like deal for a CB but this would have happened under Jim? Maybe one is a coincidence but certainly not all. There is an almost complete change in direction. We will never know but we know that it has happened under Carlie.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The facts say otherwise. Richardson was benched last year, under Jim's watch. Not only that, but he was only reinserted as the starter after Joe Flacco was literally the lowest-rated quarterback in the NFL in the game against the Vikings. If Flacco had played well and the Colts had beaten the Vikings, Richardson may have been benched even longer. Also, unlike Gardner Minshew or Joe Flacco, Daniel Jones was given a $14 Million contract for the 2025 season......under Jim's watch. Jones's ceiling was clearly higher than either a 39 year-old Joe Flacco or Gardner Minshew, so he was brought here clearly with the intent of competing with Anthony Richardson for the starting job. Regarding Jim's lucidity, you are presuming that he was not lucid enough to oversee the Daniel Jones contract, but that he necessarily would have been lucid enough to insist that Anthony Richardson be the starting quarterback for the upcoming season? It's nice to know how much of an insider you are in regard to the Irsay family. You can claim whatever you want to claim, but the facts say otherwise. o |
There is plenty of credit to go around. Jim oversaw the building of the base of this team. The finishing touches have come under Carlies administration. That one has built on the other doesn't take anything away from either. This team wasn't totally built in the last year but to deny credit to the current ownership seems wrong. Saying Carlie probably oversaw this last year (when AR was first sat) doesn't take away from Jim in my opinion. He certainly isn't running this now. When Carlie took over we will probably never know for sure but she clearly is in charge now.
|
⁷
Quote:
OK, that may very well be true. Ballard could be operating differently this year. Prior to the Sauce Gardner trade, I stated that I would be very surprised if Ballard pulled the trigger on a trade that could potentially mortgage the Colts' future, because of the fact that he has been relatively conservative prior to 2025 ...... and then Ballard went ahead and traded away two 1st-round draft picks for a stud corner back. I do believe that this would still be a 7-2 team as it currently is if Jim were alive, primarily because of the vast improvement at quarterback. o |
Quote:
I'm glad that you overcame pancreatic cancer ...... like yourself, I didn't know that there was a "good kind", I was only aware of the one in which is almost always a death-sentence for the patient (less than 10% of pancreatic cancer patients are still alive 5 years after being diagnosed.) o |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I may be one of the few that is glad that Ballard is coming back in 2026, also ...... the Colts have had 2 quarterbacks that worked well with the teams that he has assembled (Philip Rivers in 2020, and Daniel Jones in the first 10 games of the 2025 season), but only 1 season as a bona-fide contender in his 9 year tenure as the team's GM (2017 through 2025), but I'm still glad that he's coming back. o |
I was premature in my initial assessment of Ballard this year. Am not happy he is back but hope I am wrong
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.