#1
|
||||
|
||||
Colts sign Gilmore & Kemp
Colts Sign Gilmore and Brandon Kemp OT
__________________
Life is hard, its harder if you're stupid. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lov2fish For This Useful Post: | ||
#2
|
||||
|
||||
First pick is almost certainly a wide receiver now!
__________________
"I went to Ancestry.com and Jim Bob Cooter and me are cousins!” |
The Following User Says Thank You to CletusPyle For This Useful Post: | ||
Lov2fish (04-15-2022) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I would hope, but wouldn't be disappointed with a good tight end should one fall in our lap.
__________________
Life is hard, its harder if you're stupid. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lov2fish For This Useful Post: | ||
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why not OT? The draft is much deeper in WR's than OT's. Better to get one early.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
If their internal grades have a player rated at, say, an 85... I don't see them instead drafting a player they rated as a 79 because he plays WR or OT or TE.
If the best player available is a linebacker, I bet we take a linebacker. If it's a safety, I bet we take a safety. Be nice if things lined up with one of our shallow positions, but they aren't going to skip over a guy they like. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Binder say “best player available” |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I get it, still bet it is a WR......
__________________
"I went to Ancestry.com and Jim Bob Cooter and me are cousins!” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Knowing Ballard, if the value is not there he trades down until it is getting more swings at the woodpile.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I would think OT would still be on the table. Kemp seems like a potential depth guy.
|
|
|