ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion > User Submitted Blogs
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2017, 04:14 PM
RCAChainGang's Avatar
RCAChainGang RCAChainGang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 472
Thanks: 15
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

If we let Doyle walk with all the cap we have I will be pissed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2017, 05:25 PM
Pez Pez is offline
Accidental Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 685 Times in 374 Posts
Default

I'd love to be able to keep Doyle and Allen... Allen was decent two years ago, so I have a hard time believing that his hands issues this year are anything more than an off year.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2017, 11:49 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,212
Thanks: 992
Thanked 2,253 Times in 1,175 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pez View Post
I'd love to be able to keep Doyle and Allen... Allen was decent two years ago, so I have a hard time believing that his hands issues this year are anything more than an off year.
I agree he is worth as much as his cap hit to cut him and potentially worth much more. If push came to shove I would cut him to keep Doyle as long is the money is in line with a top 15ish TE.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:09 AM
Blue Thunder Blue Thunder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 29
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Some of you guys would be happy with anything that walks.... Where the hell is Dallas Clark type good TE's? We're behind the curve. The TE is the offensive weapon now. I like Doyle as a back-up. Swoope is not a starter. Allen cost us a shot at the division in London......not a fan.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2017, 08:41 AM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,757
Thanks: 1,827
Thanked 1,206 Times in 531 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Thunder View Post
Some of you guys would be happy with anything that walks.... Where the hell is Dallas Clark type good TE's? We're behind the curve. The TE is the offensive weapon now. I like Doyle as a back-up. Swoope is not a starter. Allen cost us a shot at the division in London......not a fan.
Really?

Of those players who had either over 10 receptions or 100 yards receiving:

#1 Pass Offense = NO
WR = 56.9% of receptions, 66.3% of receiving yards
TE. = 13.8% of receptions, 14.8% of receiving yards
RB. = 29.3% of receptions, 18.9% of receiving yards

#2 Pass Offense = WAS
WR = 49.8% of receptions, 58.5% of receiving yards
TE. = 27.1% of receptions, 25.6% of receiving yards
RB. = 15.1% of receptions, 15.9% of receiving yards

#3 Pass Offense = ATL
WR = 58.3% of receptions, 63.9% of receiving yards
TE. = 14.4% of receptions, 15.0% of receiving yards
RB. = 27.3% of receptions, 21.1% of receiving yards

#4 Pass Offense = NE
WR = 51.2% of receptions, 54.5% of receiving yards
TE. = 21.7% of receptions, 27.8% of receiving yards
RB. = 27.1% of receptions, 17.7% of receiving yards

#5 Pass Offense = IND
WR = 48.5% of receptions, 57.4% of receiving yards
TE. = 29.5% of receptions, 28.9% of receiving yards
RB. = 22.0% of receptions, 13.7% of receiving yards

I am not positive that I am ready to just cut all our WRs in order to play all TEs all season long. WRs still count for around 50-60% of the top team's passing game; the TE/RB ratio is bound to be determined by the offensive scheme.

Also, of the top offenses, the Colts used their TEs more than any of the other top teams. You might want to start becoming a fan of our TEs because they got the job done when asked to do so.

Cheers,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-2017, 01:14 AM
bertjones's Avatar
bertjones bertjones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 91
Thanked 151 Times in 64 Posts
Default

The chemistry between Luck and Doyle is unmistakable. You resign
him and let the rest take care of itself.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2017, 08:50 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,243
Thanks: 1,467
Thanked 4,300 Times in 1,759 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Thunder View Post
Some of you guys would be happy with anything that walks.... Where the hell is Dallas Clark type good TE's? We're behind the curve. The TE is the offensive weapon now. I like Doyle as a back-up. Swoope is not a starter. Allen cost us a shot at the division in London......not a fan.
Wtf are you talking about? Allen didn't cost us the jags game
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2017, 09:55 AM
PeytonsForehead PeytonsForehead is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Tight End is an offensive weapon... However, that doesn't mean we need to constantly be searching for the "truth" like Clark, Graham, etc... Doyle isn't an athletic freak like Gronk. Unless he wants to stay for cheap then I don't want him when we're paying Allen all of that money.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:20 PM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,133
Thanks: 934
Thanked 1,477 Times in 815 Posts
Default

Spotrac projects Doyle to get a four-year deal worth $24,803,317, which would pay him an average of $6,200,829 per season.

opinions? I think I would do it unless it really prohibits us from a better FA even at another position.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2017, 02:30 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,074
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,665 Times in 964 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
Wtf are you talking about? Allen didn't cost us the jags game
You're blind. He dropped a pass on 4th and 1 that would've extended a potential game winning drive.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post:
DrSpaceman (02-02-2017)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.