Any word on Chad Kelly?

[Spike]

Damn, I like his upside more than Hoyer. If Hoyer ever has to play, we are FUBAR.

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by Spike

Damn, I like his upside more than Hoyer. If Hoyer ever has to play, we are FUBAR.

If he has to take over yeah. If he has to fill in for a game or two I like Hoyer better than Kelly.

Kelly’s has a nice arm, but I feel like everyone went from just a camp body to hey we could win with this kid. I think he’s being a bit over valued.

Going to be a decent QB draft next draft. I bet we grab someone in the first two rounds.

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by rm1369

Any team making a claim on him is certainly desperate, but there are always teams desperate for a QB. And let’s be clear - I’m not suggesting this is some major screw up by Ballard if he doesn’t end up on the Colts PS. I’d just like to see him stay with them.

Me too. Right now Hoyer is the better option. Kelly has promise, and the way QBs are dropping, I think hes worth the invest in time.

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by Spike

Damn, I like his upside more than Hoyer. If Hoyer ever has to play, we are FUBAR.

Brisset is ok, hes not the main reason this team will succeed. The run game and the D is going to be the reason. Brisset cant be a turnover machine. And I feel better about his performance since the NFL admitted the screw him on the false starts.

Hoyer needs to play the same way. Dont force anything

[YDFL Commish]

Originally Posted by JAFF

Hoyer needs to play the same way. Dont force anything

Don't force anything? I'm tired of hearing this kind of talk. A good to great QB has to be confident in himself and his receivers and force things that the mediocre just will not do.

If Brissett is check down charlie every week, then we become predictable and thus easily beatable.

[Oldcolt]

Originally Posted by Spike

Damn, I like his upside more than Hoyer. If Hoyer ever has to play, we are FUBAR.

I’m not so sure if he has more upside than Brissett. I tend to doubt that. He moves better and is way more aggressive. Aggressive is great if you have Lucks talent. Aggressive with not so much talent, in the NFL, nor so great. I do think his floor is definitely lower than Brissett.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by JAFF

I know this sounds silly but we should be more worried about our all pro linebacker being able to play than whether not Chad Kelly clears waivers

great post bro


we also shouldn't post because Luck retired. yay. lets go boys

[Spike]

Originally Posted by Oldcolt

I’m not so sure if he has more upside than Brissett. I tend to doubt that. He moves better and is way more aggressive. Aggressive is great if you have Lucks talent. Aggressive with not so much talent, in the NFL, nor so great. I do think his floor is definitely lower than Brissett.

Yeah, I was comparing him to Hoyer, not Brissett.

[Hoopsdoc]

Originally Posted by Racehorse

If he isn't scooped up, then he is over-valued by some here. If he is, does it vindicate these same folks, or does it mean teams are desperate?

In my opinion, people were seriously over valuing Kelly. He’s nothing special. He just looked amazing because he was alternating with Walker.

[Discflinger]

All this shit cracks me up.