ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:13 PM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,905
Thanks: 3,323
Thanked 1,965 Times in 1,038 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Welcome to a Top 10 pick in 2019.
You are a fool, Nelson was Ballards choice regardless of if Chubb was there ... great pick
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:15 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Welcome to a Top 10 pick in 2019.
Do you hate Ballard as much as you hated Grigson now?
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:44 PM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 933
Thanked 1,476 Times in 814 Posts
Default

When cle took ward I thought Chubb was ours
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post:
Puck (04-26-2018), VeveJones007 (04-26-2018)
  #164  
Old 04-26-2018, 10:01 PM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,905
Thanks: 3,323
Thanked 1,965 Times in 1,038 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
When cle took ward I thought Chubb was ours
As fast as Colts picked, Nelson was Ballards choice all along, even if Chubb was there ... IMHO
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 04-26-2018, 11:12 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,200
Thanks: 991
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,167 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Welcome to a Top 10 pick in 2019.
Christ man come off it. It is ok to like a pick over another without being a total dumbass. I appreciate a lot of your statistical analysis, stop being a douche. It is ok to disagree man.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 04-27-2018, 12:00 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5,995
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,595 Times in 925 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
Christ man come off it. It is ok to like a pick over another without being a total dumbass. I appreciate a lot of your statistical analysis, stop being a douche. It is ok to disagree man.
The Colts have no linebackers and no pass rush. They had two potential generational talents at LB staring them in the face and at least one team looking to trade up for a QB. While I wouldn't have been thrilled with 12, 53, and 56, Edmunds and two more second round picks would've been vastly superior to Nelson. Now, the only potential game changing defensive talent I see on the board is Rasheem Green and Harold Landry, and there isn't a LB worth taking until Day 3. Hopefully someday this franchise will learn that defense wins championships. Clearly they haven't yet.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 04-27-2018, 12:05 AM
Luck4Reich's Avatar
Luck4Reich Luck4Reich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,558
Thanks: 1,988
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,639 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
The Colts have no linebackers and no pass rush. They had two potential generational talents at LB staring them in the face and at least one team looking to trade up for a QB. While I wouldn't have been thrilled with 12, 53, and 56, Edmunds and two more second round picks would've been vastly superior to Nelson. Now, the only potential game changing defensive talent I see on the board is Rasheem Green and Harold Landry, and there isn't a LB worth taking until Day 3. Hopefully someday this franchise will learn that defense wins championships. Clearly they haven't yet.
I,agree 100% that defense wins championships... but if our QB is dead then what? I feel confident we still get some solid defenders. If Luck goes down again I say we have zero chances with Briskett even if we had Jacksonville Defense.. and we are more that 1-2great defenders from their D. IMO
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post:
Coltsfever (06-19-2019), Maniac (04-27-2018)
  #168  
Old 04-27-2018, 12:27 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5,995
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,595 Times in 925 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck View Post
I,agree 100% that defense wins championships... but if our QB is dead then what? I feel confident we still get some solid defenders. If Luck goes down again I say we have zero chances with Briskett even if we had Jacksonville Defense.. and we are more that 1-2great defenders from their D. IMO
Where do you think you get a core of impact defenders if your GM won't spend in free agency like Jacksonville? It typically isn't Day 3 of the draft. And if the current OL coach couldn't make do with the OL talent that was on the roster before tonight, get a better OL coach.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 04-27-2018, 01:31 AM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 933
Thanked 1,476 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck View Post
I,agree 100% that defense wins championships... but if our QB is dead then what? I feel confident we still get some solid defenders. If Luck goes down again I say we have zero chances with Briskett even if we had Jacksonville Defense.. and we are more that 1-2great defenders from their D. IMO
You take the difference maker D player at 6 and some guards in the second round. Pretty sure that would have a higher net positive.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post:
Dam8610 (04-27-2018)
  #170  
Old 04-27-2018, 02:13 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5,995
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,595 Times in 925 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
You take the difference maker D player at 6 and some guards in the second round. Pretty sure that would have a higher net positive.
Or, you know, use that 2nd rounder on a defender as well and find your starting OGs on Day 3 like most good teams do.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.