ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2018, 01:43 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default Interesting Analysis on 2017 Colts

Warren Sharp put together a long Twitter thread on the 2017 Colts and how bad coaching made their record worse than you would expect with even an average coaching staff.

Quote:
I have a pretty unbelievable story to share regarding the 2017 Colts. This team has largely been forgotten, because they didn't have Andrew Luck & the coaching staff was fired after the season. This is a story about the consequences of horrendous decision making.

The 2017 Colts finished as the 3rd worst team in the league, per the standings, and they won only 4 games all season.

But in their 16-game season, the Colts trailed at halftime in only 6 games. They held halftime leads in 9 games. Yet they went 2-7 in games they led at halftime.

The 2017 Colts are the ONLY team in the last 27 years to lose at least 7 games which they led at halftime.

Their leads didn’t mysteriously evaporate in the 3rd quarter. The Colts led through three quarters in 9 games.

The 2017 Colts are the ONLY team in the last 20 years to hold a lead entering the 4th quarter in at least 9 games, but win no more than 4 games.

Last year, 25 of 32 teams lost no more than one game when leading entering the 4th quarter, and roughly 35% of them won every game. Six teams lost two games when entering the 4th quarter with a lead. The only team to lose more than twice was the Colts, who lost FIVE times.

Last year, a total of five teams held a lead entering the 4th quarter in exactly 9 games. Every single team posted a winning record (aside from the Colts):
• Jaguars (10 wins)
• Chiefs (10 wins)
• Falcons (10 wins)
• Chargers (9 wins)
• Colts (4 wins)

Last year, the only teams to post 4 or fewer wins on the year led after the 4th quarter in an avg of only 2.7 games (aside from the Colts):
•Browns (0 Ws, up thru 3Q in 1 gm)
•Giants (3 Ws, up thru 3Q in 4)
•Texans (4 Ws, up thru 3Q in 3)
•Colts (4 Ws, up thru 3Q in 9)

In their first 11 games of the season, the Colts led entering the 4th quarter in 8 games. The only two teams that led entering the 4th quarter more than 8 games (through 11) were the Super Bowl Champion Eagles and the Super Bowl runner-up Patriots.

Although they led entering the 4th quarter in 8 of their first 11 games, the Colts did not start the year 8-3. Instead, the Colts won only 3 of these games. They lost 5 games by blowing leads in the 4th quarter, to drop to 3-8 on the season.

The Colts led by one-score entering the 4th quarter in 6 games, but won just one of six. They were down by one-score entering the 4th quarter in 2 games and lost both. They were 1-7 in games within one-score entering the 4th quarter, despite leading 6 of these entering the 4th.

Clearly the 2017 Colts were not a great team. But terrible teams are unable to consistently build leads into halftime and into the 4th quarter, like the Colts were routinely able to do. "Something" happened in the 4th quarter to cause such disasterous results. Buckle up...

I'll interrupt to add that this type of analysis is exactly what I do on all 32 teams in my book writing process. The 2018 Football Preview book is in process, and will be out this summer. But this couldn't wait. This was just too gross to lock up for 4 more months.

We're going to get into the dirty details of 4th quarter decision making, play calls & more. This was a large factor in the reason that the Colts blew so many 4th quarter leads. I'll put all of this into an article later, to compliment this thread.

On 1D in the 4Q, if a team is in a one-score game, they run the ball 53% of the time. The Colts ran the ball 64% of the time, 3rd most in the NFL. This despite the fact that on 1D runs they recorded a 35% success rate (2.5 YPC) vs a 53% success rate (7.8 YPA) on 1D passes.

On these 4th quarter runs, Frank Gore posted just a 30% success rate. A younger, fresher Marlon Mack recorded a 57% success rate, but received 1/3rd the carries as Gore, who was worn down by taking on a lot of carries through 3 quarters.

On 1st down in the 4th quarter, when winning by 1 score, the Colts ran the ball 79% of the time and recorded a 42% success rate on these runs (2.6 YPC). However, on their 1st down passes, they recorded a 100% success rate with 22.0 YPA.

On 1st down in the 4th quarter, when winning by 1 score, the Colts used 11 personnel (3 WRs) 30% of the time. The other 70%, they were in 12 or 13 personnel (1-2 WRs). ***If they had less than 3 WRs they went 100% run*** posting 2.4 YPC and a 38% success rate.

I used asterisks there to indicate a theme. A theme of predictability. A huge key to winning in the NFL is being unpredictable. If the opponent knows your tendencies, you are waging an uphill battle. Especially if your "tendencies" are acutally 100% "tells".


How about 1st downs when losing? On 1st down in the 4th quarter, if a team is losing they pass the ball 73% of the time on avg (27% run). But the Colts went 43% run, 2nd most in the NFL. The Rams were #1, but were successful on 57% of runs. The Colts were successful on just 32%.

Lets move on to 2nd down. On 2nd down in the 4th quarter when winning, if the Colts ***did not use 11 personnel (3 WRs) they went 100% run***. These runs averaged just 1.7 YPC.

Combining 1st & 2nd down in the 4th quarter, in a one-score game, the Colts ran the ball on 34 of 40 (85%) plays with 2 or fewer WRs. They avg'd just 2.0 YPC and a 29% success rate. The only passes IND threw here was when the game was tied or trailing, never when leading.

When not using 3WRs, they used 12 personnel on 95% of their plays, the highest reate in the league. Their 85% run rate from non-11 personnel was the 3rd highest in the league.

In the 4Q when playing with a lead, the Colts were the only team in the NFL to NEVER pass unless they had 3 WRs on the field on early downs. If they had a lead & anything less than 3 WRs on the field, they ran 100% of the time. They avg'd 2.1 YPC. There was ZERO threat to pass.

Bottom line: the 2017 Colts were the most predictable early down offense in the NFL in the 4th quarter of one-score games. But just when you think it couldn't, it gets worse...

On 3rd down with a 4th quarter lead, once again the Colts were 100% run unless they were in 11 personnel (3 WRs). These runs were so predictable, the Colts posted a 0% success rate and they gained an average of 0 YPC on these runs.


Combining every down in the 4th quarter, if the Colts were leading, they went 100% run unless they lined up in 11 personnel with 3 WRs. They were the only team in the NFL to go 100% run. With such predictability, these runs gained just 1.9 YPC and recorded a 38% success rate.

4th quarter predictability led to inefficient rushing, which severely hampered the Colts ability to win those 9 games they led entering the 4th quarter. But rushing alone wasn’t the sole cause for their horrible 4th quarter results.

The Colts were the only team playing with a 4th quarter lead to throw zero passing TDs and 2+ interceptions.

In the 4th quarter when leading, the Colts pass efficiency ranked 28th in the league, with only 29% of pass plays grading as successful (avg was 43%). Outside of the Colts 40-yard line, their passing success rate dropped to 21% (avg was 44%).

Why were the Colts so bad when passing with a 4th quarter lead? First, we need to understand the Colts were primarily a 11 personnel team when passing, which means 3 WRs. When passing, they used 3 WRs approximately 79% of the time and 2 or fewer WRs 21% of the time.

The Colts were substantially more efficient when passing from 2 or fewer WR sets:
•Using 3 WRs, they were successful on 43% of passes, delivered an 82 rating and averaged 6.8 YPA.
•Using 2 or fewer WRs, they delivered a 52% success rate, with a 91 rating and 7.8 YPA.

The Colts were 1 of only 6 teams to post a sub-45% passing success rate with 3+ WRs and over-50% passing success rate with 2 or fewer WRs.

The Colts were extremely successful when passing using 2 or fewer WRs with a lead in the first 3 quarters, recording an incredibly strong 58% success rate on those passes. That rate was 8% better than the NFL average.

But for whatever reason, when leading in the 4th quarter, the Colts NEVER attempted a pass using 2 or fewer WRs. They only used 3+ WRs. And on these 3+ WR attempts, the recorded a 33% success rate, 6.9 YPA and a 46.2 rating.


The Colts were completely predictable in a number of ways in the 4th quarter. They worked against themselves. They refused to pass out of their most successful personnel groupings for passing. Their predictability led to inefficiency, which caused hard-earned leads to slip away.

When their leads slipped away, why didn’t Colts come back to win when trailing by close margins in the 4th quarter? When down one score in the 4th quarter, the NFL average is 64% pass on early downs. When they do run the ball, the NFL average is 4.5 YPC and a 49% success rate.

When down one score in the 4Q, the Colts ran the ball 10% more than avg on early downs. This would only make sense if they were phenomenal when running. But they averaged just 1.9 YPC and posted a 19% success rate. Both were the WORST of any team in the NFL.

Meanwhile, on early down passes when down one score in the 4Q, the Colts averaged a 53% success rate (well above NFL average of 47%) & a 104 passer rating (well above the NFL average of 80). Choosing to run 10% above average & sacrificing such value was extremely unwise.

The sad part is, the Colts probably didn't even realize or measure the impact of their 4th quarter play calling. It was far worse than they could have imagined. My guess is they had no idea that they NEVER passed while maintaining a 4th qtr lead without 3 WRs on the field.

They likewise probably had no idea that the only teams to enter the 4Q with a lead more often than themselves (through week 12) faced each other in this year's Super Bowl: the Eagles & Patriots.


It's unfortunate to sit back now and realize that many of these 4th quarter leads which became losses were avoidable with stronger attention to detail and a better focus on analytics.

Often time fans and media are quick to place blame on players making a mistake on the field, without realizing the play call wasn't optimal to begin with, and majority blame should shift elsewhere. Understanding responsibility for the error is essential to correcting it.

I would have saved all of this for my book, but I don't think enough people viewed the 2017 Colts in this light, and I didn't want to sit on this until the 2018 Football Preview book publishes in June. I'll put this thread into an article tonight for easier digestion.

Here's a link to the article he posted about the topic.

Last edited by VeveJones007; 02-23-2018 at 01:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
1965southpaw (02-23-2018), Brylok (02-23-2018), Colts And Orioles (02-25-2018), FatDT (02-23-2018), Maniac (02-23-2018), Pez (02-23-2018), Racehorse (02-23-2018), sherck (02-24-2018), smitty46953 (02-23-2018), Spike (02-23-2018), Thorgrim (02-23-2018), YDFL Commish (02-23-2018)
  #2  
Old 02-23-2018, 01:44 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

While this focused on the offensive side of the ball, the defense really exacerbated the issue of playing with a lead. The defense was slow with no pass rush, which allowed opposing QBs to have all day to throw late in games.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-23-2018, 01:58 PM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,905
Thanks: 3,323
Thanked 1,965 Times in 1,038 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Warren Sharp put together a long Twitter thread on the 2017 Colts and how bad coaching made their record worse than you would expect with even an average coaching staff.




Here's a link to the article he posted about the topic.
So you are saying we were predictable? LOL Funny Chuck and his crew didn't notice what most fans knew ...
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to smitty46953 For This Useful Post:
sherck (02-24-2018), VeveJones007 (02-23-2018)
  #4  
Old 02-23-2018, 02:46 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 1,973
Thanked 2,211 Times in 1,191 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Warren Sharp put together a long Twitter thread on the 2017 Colts and how bad coaching made their record worse than you would expect with even an average coaching staff.




Here's a link to the article he posted about the topic.
Why why would I believe staggeringly irrefutable facts, when I have Dammy telling me coaching doesn't matter?
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
Butter (02-23-2018), omahacolt (02-24-2018), sherck (02-24-2018), smitty46953 (02-23-2018), VeveJones007 (02-23-2018)
  #5  
Old 02-23-2018, 02:49 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Coaching matters. Playcalling matters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-23-2018, 04:34 PM
HoosierinFL's Avatar
HoosierinFL HoosierinFL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,565
Thanks: 218
Thanked 1,647 Times in 790 Posts
Default

my god. I mean, we all saw this trend (except Dam) all year, but to see those stats present it so clearly, it's almost as if Pagano was throwing the games.

edit: its also why i think this roster isn't as bad as many think it is. I'm not saying it's without holes, is surely is, but many of these guys will look a lot better with coaches who actually know what they're doing.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HoosierinFL For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (02-23-2018), sherck (02-24-2018)
  #7  
Old 02-23-2018, 04:37 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierinFL View Post
my god. I mean, we all saw this trend (except Dam) all year, but to see those stats present it so clearly, it's almost as if Pagano was throwing the games.

edit: its also why i think this roster isn't as bad as many think it is. I'm not saying it's without holes, is surely is, but many of these guys will look a lot better with coaches who actually know what they're doing.
Yep. Competent coaching, okay offensive line play, good quarterbacking, and some semblance of pass rush immediately makes the 2018 Colts a potential playoff team.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-23-2018, 05:08 PM
1965southpaw's Avatar
1965southpaw 1965southpaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 997
Thanks: 548
Thanked 818 Times in 391 Posts
Default

Hell, even Pagano said it clearly........We JUST do what we do....over and over and over again....no creativity, no unpredictability......we follow the Proshess.....shame on all the so-called analysts who just skim the surface (Luck out = Colts suck) and didn't diagnose and report what was really happening. Maybe, just maybe if the reporting weren't so kind to this coaching staff Irsay would have moved faster to make a change. Oh well, old news. I prefer to look forward to the future.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1965southpaw For This Useful Post:
Discflinger (02-25-2018), sherck (02-24-2018)
  #9  
Old 02-23-2018, 05:31 PM
Pez Pez is offline
Accidental Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 684 Times in 374 Posts
Default

I remember multiple games this year being up 10 or so at half and knowing without a doubt that it wasn't enough. I agree with hoosierInFL that our personnel is not as bad as most think.

The stat I found most interesting is the stat where our success rate passing with < 3 WRs was so much better than our pass rate with >= 3 WRs.

This is a stunning indictment of the Pagano regime / system. Everyone beside Pagano knew how predictable the Colts were.
__________________
** 2017 Premier league champion **

"I want to dominate all my opponents, and take their will away to play the game, by each play, and finishing them past the whistle."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-23-2018, 06:20 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 1,973
Thanked 2,211 Times in 1,191 Posts
Default

This:

Quote:
In the 4Q when playing with a lead, the Colts were the only team in the NFL to NEVER pass unless they had 3 WRs on the field on early downs. If they had a lead & anything less than 3 WRs on the field, they ran 100% of the time. They avg'd 2.1 YPC. There was ZERO threat to pass.
WTF! How is that even possible.

Film study by our opponents must have lasted less than hour.

Apparently the Colts were the only team in the league that didn't self-scout themselves. What a bunch of fukn bozos!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (02-24-2018)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.