ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-30-2019, 12:24 PM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Burfict suspended for the rest of the season. Good. Fucking dirty bastard deserves it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Maniac For This Useful Post:
Indystu2 (10-01-2019), jasperhobbs (09-30-2019), Racehorse (09-30-2019), Spike (09-30-2019)
  #42  
Old 09-30-2019, 01:38 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,343
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 3,683 Times in 2,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac View Post
Burfict suspended for the rest of the season. Good. Fucking dirty bastard deserves it.
That hit was inexcusable, especially considering all the work the officials and league have done trying to get him to clean up his game. My guess is he just can’t control his emotions on the field.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-30-2019, 01:40 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,343
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 3,683 Times in 2,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck4Reich View Post
Yet Al Woods is off to a great start playing very well for the Seahawks who are the #4 rushing Defense in the NFL. Nope Colts couldnt use a guy like that.
Who run a very similar defense
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-30-2019, 02:45 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

One thing I noticed on occasion when reviewing the All 22 the last two games: the LBs and DBs were often spending too much time reading the QB and not enough time watching for receivers entering/leaving their zone. The result was what seemed to be "soft" coverage and players not getting the proper depth. I'll be keying in on that during my review of the All 22 this week.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (09-30-2019)
  #45  
Old 09-30-2019, 03:07 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,241
Thanks: 1,466
Thanked 4,297 Times in 1,758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
One thing I noticed on occasion when reviewing the All 22 the last two games: the LBs and DBs were often spending too much time reading the QB and not enough time watching for receivers entering/leaving their zone. The result was what seemed to be "soft" coverage and players not getting the proper depth. I'll be keying in on that during my review of the All 22 this week.
You don’t really need all 22 to see the lbers dont pay much mind to people around their zones
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
indycolts2 (10-01-2019)
  #46  
Old 09-30-2019, 03:32 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
You don’t really need all 22 to see the lbers dont pay much mind to people around their zones
In some cases, you're right. In others, there's a levels concept that you can't see without the All 22.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-30-2019, 04:44 PM
ChoppedWood ChoppedWood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 2,901
Thanked 1,994 Times in 1,136 Posts
Default

MF'er- Venturi just said that from halftime of the Falcon's game until 1 minute gone in the 2nd Qtr yest- Ryan and Carr completed 30 of 31 fucking attempts!

That's garbage, that's ass, that's a fucking joke.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChoppedWood For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (09-30-2019), Racehorse (09-30-2019)
  #48  
Old 09-30-2019, 05:24 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,432
Thanks: 2,045
Thanked 2,264 Times in 1,218 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
One thing I noticed on occasion when reviewing the All 22 the last two games: the LBs and DBs were often spending too much time reading the QB and not enough time watching for receivers entering/leaving their zone. The result was what seemed to be "soft" coverage and players not getting the proper depth. I'll be keying in on that during my review of the All 22 this week.
I've noticed that as well.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (09-30-2019)
  #49  
Old 09-30-2019, 07:08 PM
AlwaysSunnyinIndy AlwaysSunnyinIndy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 2,135
Thanks: 662
Thanked 2,658 Times in 1,180 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike View Post
Really thought FR should have attempted on onside kick at the end considering how bad the defense was playing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic View Post
Success rate of onside kicks is now practically zero since there's no running start and no unbalanced lineup for the kick


Reich was asked this question - Why no onside kick? - during his conference call with the media. He stated that since the rule change, the kicking team hardly recovers the ball - only a 7 percent recovery rate.


https://twitter.com/JoelAErickson/st...65349329735681

Quote:
Reich says the numbers on onside kicks are 7 percent recoveries for kicking team since the new rule.

Last edited by AlwaysSunnyinIndy; 09-30-2019 at 10:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AlwaysSunnyinIndy For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (09-30-2019)
  #50  
Old 09-30-2019, 09:24 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy View Post
Reich was asked this question - Why no onside kick? - during his conference call with the media. He stated that since the rule change, the kicking team hardly recovers the ball - only a 7 percent recovery rate.


https://twitter.com/JoelAErickson/st...65349329735681
I was fine with the decision. Sanchez needs a better kick, though. You pin them down around the 10, get a stop, and hopefully get the ball around the 50 with just under a minute left. I think that’s more likely than 7%.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.