ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-14-2022, 06:11 PM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 934
Thanked 1,476 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Engram is slated to sign a one-year deal with the Jaguars, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2022, 08:06 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,114
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 1,282 Times in 727 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
I tend to agree but fixing the qb position is the only really important job Ballard has, imo. That’s all that really matters.
While QB is by far the top priority there are other high priorities that need to be addressed: LT, CB, WR (although no point here unless we get a QB), DE, S. If Ballard sits on $70M in cap space and doesn't adequately fill any of these then he needs to be shown the door.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-15-2022, 05:17 AM
njcoltfan njcoltfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,464
Thanks: 921
Thanked 839 Times in 494 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
While QB is by far the top priority there are other high priorities that need to be addressed: LT, CB, WR (although no point here unless we get a QB), DE, S. If Ballard sits on $70M in cap space and doesn't adequately fill any of these then he needs to be shown the door.
Maybe, players don't want to play for the Colt's !!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to njcoltfan For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (03-15-2022)
  #14  
Old 03-15-2022, 08:04 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 296
Thanked 737 Times in 410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njcoltfan View Post
Maybe, players don't want to play for the Colt's !!
Players don’t want to play at a discount for the Colts. And why would they? 5 years in and I still don’t see an obvious path to contention.

There are essentially two paths to true contention- a star QB that can help overcome deficiencies or a complete team with a competent QB. Yes Luck screwed Ballard but since then he hasn’t chosen a path. They sure as hell haven’t sold out everything for a star QB. Whiich is fine - it’s a tough high risk gamble. But put a complete fucking team around the mediocre QB then. Ballard refuses to shore up weaknesses though, instead opting to fix everything in the draft. Until Ballard changes and commits to one of the two valid paths the team will stay stuck in purgatory- wasting the talent he has acquired. I wouldn’t sign up on a discount for that either.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (03-15-2022), njcoltfan (03-15-2022)
  #15  
Old 03-15-2022, 08:46 AM
Dewey 5 Dewey 5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,818
Thanks: 2,641
Thanked 1,115 Times in 621 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njcoltfan View Post
Maybe, players don't want to play for the Colt's !!
Or maybe Ballard thinks the cap money goes with to his next job. We Irsay should have kept Tom Telesco
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-15-2022, 01:36 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 2,551
Thanked 2,430 Times in 1,092 Posts
Default

This lack of spending in free agency is getting ridiculous. Some guy (Field Yates) has pointed out that over the last 6 years the team that spent the most in free agency has increased its win total by at least 3 wins (goes from 3-7). Ballard is full of shit when he disses free agency, it is true you will 'overspend' but you also win more games. IF he is so stubborn that he refuses to spend on free agency this year because he won't 'overspend' on a player-even if it is the only way to fill a position of critical need-well to me he has a beautiful theory, but it is setting up the Colts for continued mediocrity as long as he is here and he needs to go.

https://horseshoeheroes.com/2022/03/...space-history/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oldcolt For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (03-15-2022)
  #17  
Old 03-15-2022, 01:59 PM
Dewey 5 Dewey 5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,818
Thanks: 2,641
Thanked 1,115 Times in 621 Posts
Default

Ballard has worn out his welcome with me. I was pretty much done with him & Reich when we lost to the Raiders & Jagoffs. Time to start over again.

Last edited by Dewey 5; 03-15-2022 at 02:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-15-2022, 02:11 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 3,610 Times in 2,021 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
Engram is slated to sign a one-year deal with the Jaguars, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports
Hands of stone. Deep draft of TEs, probably get one there.

Problem with TEs now is they are either blockers or big receivers. Seems very few that can do both and Colts like guys who can do both. We have Granson who should improve as a receiver. I bet they would like a do it all guy. A couple in the draft.

Last edited by Chromeburn; 03-15-2022 at 02:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (03-15-2022)
  #19  
Old 03-15-2022, 02:12 PM
AlwaysSunnyinIndy AlwaysSunnyinIndy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 2,093
Thanks: 648
Thanked 2,591 Times in 1,154 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
Some guy (Field Yates) has pointed out that over the last 6 years the team that spent the most in free agency has increased its win total by at least 3 wins (goes from 3-7).

The bump in wins is only temporary, however.

Take a look at the win totals of those teams the following season:

2016: Giants +5, then -8 the next year
2017: Jaguars +7, then -5
2018: Bears +7, then -4
2019: Jets +3, then -5
2020: Dolphins +5, then -1 (with extra game from 17 game season)

Last edited by AlwaysSunnyinIndy; 03-15-2022 at 02:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AlwaysSunnyinIndy For This Useful Post:
apballin (03-15-2022), ChaosTheory (03-15-2022), Oldcolt (03-15-2022), Racehorse (03-15-2022)
  #20  
Old 03-15-2022, 02:54 PM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,410
Thanks: 485
Thanked 1,591 Times in 763 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy View Post
The bump is wins is only temporary, however.

Take a look at the win totals the following season:

2016: Giants +5, then -8 the next year
2017: Jaguars +7, then -5
2018: Bears +7, then -4
2019: Jets +3, then -5
2020: Dolphins +5, then -1 (with extra game from 17 game season)
Right.

Also, these teams were winning like 2-5 games the season before. So they're playing last-place schedules AND making high draft picks AND spending all their money.... And a lot of times they're getting to what? 6-7 wins? And then they're right back in the cellar again when they don't play the last place schedule

By the way, you can tell without going back and reading the archives here who was happy during the off-season when Grigson bought Gore, Johnson, Cole, etc.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ChaosTheory For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (03-15-2022)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.