ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-17-2018, 10:01 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,211
Thanks: 992
Thanked 2,249 Times in 1,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
They're sticking with scheme fit. If our new scheme can't use Hankins then it sucks. This is like when Freeney wasn't a scheme fit. Fuck the scheme. Adjust to the talent on the roster. That's what good coaches do.
I agree with that. In this case at least Hankins was basically signed to a 1 year contract with 2 team options. I suspect Ballard considered it a one year deal.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-17-2018, 10:09 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,050
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,639 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
They're sticking with scheme fit. If our new scheme can't use Hankins then it sucks. This is like when Freeney wasn't a scheme fit. Fuck the scheme. Adjust to the talent on the roster. That's what good coaches do.
1) Freeney would've worked in a 3-4, Justin Houston does.

2) I don't understand why they released Hankins and kept Woods. I'd think Hankins would be the better 4-3 NT.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-17-2018, 10:12 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,238
Thanks: 1,460
Thanked 4,290 Times in 1,755 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
I agree with that. In this case at least Hankins was basically signed to a 1 year contract with 2 team options. I suspect Ballard considered it a one year deal.
Then trade him for a 5th at worst
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (03-18-2018)
  #44  
Old 03-17-2018, 10:43 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
1) Freeney would've worked in a 3-4, Justin Houston does.

2) I don't understand why they released Hankins and kept Woods. I'd think Hankins would be the better 4-3 NT.
Yes, yes he would've. That is the point I'm making.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-17-2018, 11:29 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,720
Thanks: 8,194
Thanked 4,808 Times in 2,679 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
They're sticking with scheme fit. If our new scheme can't use Hankins then it sucks. This is like when Freeney wasn't a scheme fit. Fuck the scheme. Adjust to the talent on the roster. That's what good coaches do.
This was the beginning of me hating fucking Pagano. Freeney is a HOF and Pagano was the POS that let him go way too damn early.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
Coltsalr (03-17-2018), Racehorse (03-18-2018)
  #46  
Old 03-18-2018, 12:47 AM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,720
Thanks: 8,194
Thanked 4,808 Times in 2,679 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana V2 View Post
Doubt they're going after Suh, and if they released Hankins to free up money for Suh, then what happens if they don't get Suh?
Fuck Suh. He wouldn't make any difference on this team right now anyway. No way I pay that MF what he thinks he is worth.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-18-2018, 01:50 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,050
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,639 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike View Post
Fuck Suh. He wouldn't make any difference on this team right now anyway. No way I pay that MF what he thinks he is worth.
A 4 time first team All Pro on the DL wouldn't make a difference to a bad defense? That's just a bad argument. As far as spending the money, they HAVE to spend some. They're at like 60% of cap right now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-18-2018, 07:38 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,238
Thanks: 1,460
Thanked 4,290 Times in 1,755 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike View Post
Fuck Suh. He wouldn't make any difference on this team right now anyway. No way I pay that MF what he thinks he is worth.
I have a feeling your mind would change if he was on the colts
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-18-2018, 08:26 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,927
Thanks: 17,112
Thanked 4,396 Times in 2,529 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
They're sticking with scheme fit. If our new scheme can't use Hankins then it sucks. This is like when Freeney wasn't a scheme fit. Fuck the scheme. Adjust to the talent on the roster. That's what good coaches do.
Or you trade the talent for an asset, but I guess they were worried about the guarantee kicking in.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-18-2018, 08:29 AM
Indiana V2's Avatar
Indiana V2 Indiana V2 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 5,630
Thanks: 858
Thanked 414 Times in 270 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
Or you trade the talent for an asset, but I guess they were worried about the guarantee kicking in.
Which we're not hurting money-wise, so it's confusing.
__________________
Irsay and Ballard got the Reich guy!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.