ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-17-2023, 08:10 AM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,059
Thanks: 2,388
Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
He's a back. Franchise him. For two years in a row if need be. Great backs are fun to watch, great to root for and fill up the stands. What they don't do is lead their teams to Super Bowl wins. Seven backs have been Super Bowl MVP, the last one was Terrell Davis in 1997. Spend big long term money on positions of impact.
This is a good idea one several fronts. With a rookie Qb, they still must account for Taylor, so the offense isnt 2 dimensional. Play action would be better with taylor than anyone else on the roster, remember what Edge and Manning created with the stretch play. And the franchise tag is a chunk of cash up front, its not an anchor down the road if taylor gets hurt.

Having an honest to God running threat would make it easier on a rookie Qb.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (06-17-2023)
  #12  
Old 06-17-2023, 09:47 AM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 2,551
Thanked 2,430 Times in 1,092 Posts
Default

We all want Taylor to be our running back. It is just how much for how long. I prefer that we don't give him a big long term contract but I don't feel super strong one way or the other except to keep him here when AR is still a young pup.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-17-2023, 12:02 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,930
Thanks: 17,133
Thanked 4,404 Times in 2,531 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
We all want Taylor to be our running back. It is just how much for how long. I prefer that we don't give him a big long term contract but I don't feel super strong one way or the other except to keep him here when AR is still a young pup.
I agree. I don't see him trying to break the bank, given what has happened to RBs with high dollar contracts. Surely his agent is smart enough to guide him the right way.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-17-2023, 12:26 PM
Colts And Orioles's Avatar
Colts And Orioles Colts And Orioles is offline
Historian
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Brewster, NY
Posts: 6,792
Thanks: 3,974
Thanked 3,270 Times in 2,017 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post



I agree. I don't see him trying to break the bank, given what has happened to RBs with high dollar contracts. l Surely, his agent is smart enough to guide him the right way.



o


You would think that, but I have seen professional athletes and their agents take extremely questionable, mind-boggling actions of which it was clear that neither could see the forest for the trees. Alex Rodriguez is the first that comes to mind, with what he and his agent did (and said) between 2001 and 2007. Rodriguez finally fired his agent (Scott Boras) in September of 2010, but not after the two of them made collective fools of themselves on several occasions over the previous 9 years.

o
__________________
BALTIMORE COLTS ))))))))))))))))))) INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

Bert Jones, Johnny Unitas, Earl Morrall ))))))))).lll) Jim Harbaugh, Peyton Manning, Andrew Luck
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-17-2023, 03:48 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,240
Thanks: 1,464
Thanked 4,292 Times in 1,757 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Okay, I'm not all in at $15 million a year. This is nothing against JT or his latest injury.

It's just that he's not an all-around back. He often gets pulled in passing situations due to his lack of route running skills. His pass blocking skills also leave something to be desired.

He's not in the McCaffery or Kamara stratosphere. That being the case, I would slot him between the $13 million and $14 million area, which would be slightly above Derrick Henry, w/no more than $25 million guaranteed at signing and no more than 4 years.
i don't know how much i want to extend him due to his pass protection issues. he wasn't good last year. i am only paying a guy that can be a 3 down back. if he can get that under control then sure. a 5 year deal we can get out of after 3 or so is fine. he is a home run threat and is a playmaker. we need those guys badly
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (06-17-2023)
  #16  
Old 06-22-2023, 01:19 PM
AlwaysSunnyinIndy AlwaysSunnyinIndy is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 2,134
Thanks: 659
Thanked 2,658 Times in 1,180 Posts
Default

FWIW - the Spotrac website attempts to calculate the market value and provides a guesstimate about a player's next contract.


For Taylor, they are projecting a 4 year, $52M contract or about $13M per year.

They used Ezekiel Elliott, Dalvin Cook, Derrick Henry and Nick Chubb as the player / contract comps.


https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/indianap.../market-value/
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AlwaysSunnyinIndy For This Useful Post:
Colts And Orioles (06-22-2023), Racehorse (06-22-2023), YDFL Commish (06-23-2023)
  #17  
Old 06-22-2023, 05:06 PM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,464
Thanks: 497
Thanked 1,649 Times in 790 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i don't know how much i want to extend him due to his pass protection issues. he wasn't good last year. i am only paying a guy that can be a 3 down back. if he can get that under control then sure. a 5 year deal we can get out of after 3 or so is fine. he is a home run threat and is a playmaker. we need those guys badly
He definitely needs to improve is pass-pro. A couple of encouraging things that should make a difference are A.) hopefully he gets/stays healthy and B.) DeAndre Smith as RB coach.

I liked Smith from his few years coaching my Red Raiders and he's been doing it a long time. But specifically, I'm looking at his time with NYG coaching Saquon Barkley who I think is quite similar to JT. Barkley was always dogged for his pass-pro and he's also been banged up the past few years.

Well, he A.) gets/stays healthy and B.) gets DeAndre Smith as his RB coach in 2022. He goes from a PFF pass-block grade of 34 in 2021 to a league-leading grade of 75.5 in 2022 (he's a mid-50's to low-60's guy his first few years). Hopefully Smith can have that affect on our RB room.

(Obligatory: PFF is not Gospel, just another piece of info)

All that said... he does have the added element of being the fastest RB in the league with the ability to make house calls from anywhere. That might warrant a re-signing to the FO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy View Post
FWIW - the Spotrac website attempts to calculate the market value and provides a guesstimate about a player's next contract.


For Taylor, they are projecting a 4 year, $52M contract or about $13M per year.

They used Ezekiel Elliott, Dalvin Cook, Derrick Henry and Nick Chubb as the player / contract comps.


https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/indianap.../market-value/
That could potentially be optimistic as far as JT's point of view. Again, if he can stay healthy and have a rebound year more in the vein of 2021, then third-best RB money won't cut it for him.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChaosTheory For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (06-22-2023), YDFL Commish (06-23-2023)
  #18  
Old 06-23-2023, 08:38 AM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,430
Thanks: 2,039
Thanked 2,258 Times in 1,217 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy View Post
FWIW - the Spotrac website attempts to calculate the market value and provides a guesstimate about a player's next contract.


For Taylor, they are projecting a 4 year, $52M contract or about $13M per year.

They used Ezekiel Elliott, Dalvin Cook, Derrick Henry and Nick Chubb as the player / contract comps.


https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/indianap.../market-value/
That's where I have him slotted as well.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-25-2023, 11:12 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,343
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 3,682 Times in 2,058 Posts
Default

Yes.

We have a QB on a rookie deal. He is a game breaking player. He is only 24 and far away from the rb wall.

Taylor’s ability to turn any run into a TD is special. It puts a lot of pressure on a defense to be disciplined in their lanes. You don’t replace that ability with just plugging in another back. Manning and two hall of fame Wrs aren’t sitting there taking attention away from a running game. It’s Taylor who takes attention away from our passing game. With an average back, teams focus on our passing and it gets shut down.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
albany ed (06-26-2023)
  #20  
Old 06-26-2023, 08:22 AM
Ironshaft Ironshaft is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 410
Thanks: 1,303
Thanked 795 Times in 270 Posts
Default

My two cents is, yes, sign him to a "big" contract that is back loaded and that we can get out of with min cap hit after year 3.

He is too valuable for a rookie QB to not be on the field with him. AR needs JT to be a threat each and every down to keep his play action valid and take the pressure off him.

Assuming that his pass protection can be improved with a new coach and JT shows that in 2023, I think there is zero reason to not have him under contract for the next 3 seasons after that.

I, personally, do not love the concept of tagging a player for multiple seasons. Just because the rules say you can does not mean that it is a good ideal from a team/player relationship standpoint. And since the Colts have rarely done so in the past couple of decades, I would think that Irsay agrees with me.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ironshaft For This Useful Post:
CletusPyle (07-19-2023), Racehorse (06-26-2023), YDFL Commish (06-26-2023)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.