ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 04-01-2018, 11:37 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Here is my biggest fear. There are only 2 legitimate MLB prospects and they are Smith and Vander Esch. We probably don't get either.

As far as my conceded the rest of the MLB prospects are garbage.

Smith could be the next Derrick Brooks and Vander Esch the next Brian Urlacher.

Yes I know Derrick Brooks wasn't a MLB.
Move back to 12 and 22 and you might get both.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 04-01-2018, 12:04 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Here is my biggest fear. There are only 2 legitimate MLB prospects and they are Smith and Vander Esch. We probably don't get either.

As far as my conceded the rest of the MLB prospects are garbage.

Smith could be the next Derrick Brooks and Vander Esch the next Brian Urlacher.

Yes I know Derrick Brooks wasn't a MLB.
What about Evans?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 04-01-2018, 01:04 PM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
I think some are going to be very surprised. I think if Chubb is there Ballard may trade the pick. I think he wants his Urlacher for this defense and that is Edmunds
That would be stupid
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Maniac For This Useful Post:
Dam8610 (04-01-2018), VeveJones007 (04-01-2018)
  #74  
Old 04-01-2018, 01:18 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,229
Thanks: 2,975
Thanked 3,205 Times in 1,692 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
What about Evans?
He's fine as a 2 down ILB. He doesn't fit the defense that Eberflus is installing.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 04-01-2018, 04:39 PM
ZiaColt ZiaColt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Move back to 12 and 22 and you might get both.
as much as the Colts need LB help, it seems unlikely they'd draft 2 in the first round.

on the other hand, I can see the draft unfolding so that, at #12, Smith IS the "BPA" and, at #22, LVE is as well. And if Ballard really is a BPA guy then I guess he would go ahead and draft those 2, and maybe hope one of the OL's (Wynn, Hernandez, O'Neill, Rankin?) and possibly one of the CB's (Oliver, Alexander, Jackson, Davis?) are there at the top of Round Two as BPA's as well.

Or one of the WR's, but I'm ambivalent about this group of receivers. Seems to be considerable quantity, but I'm not sure how much quality. Some big guys who may not run all that well, some fast guys with too many drops and/or lack of blocking ability. Would be nice to take some of the load off of Hilton, if possible.

If someone like Kirk or maybe Sutton is still there at the top of Round Two, I guess I'd give them a look, but otherwise I'm not sure there might not be a WR available at #49 or even #67 who's just as good as anyone earlier. Or another OL, or maybe a promising but under-achieving DT like Hand?

Last edited by ZiaColt; 04-01-2018 at 04:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 04-01-2018, 05:01 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,229
Thanks: 2,975
Thanked 3,205 Times in 1,692 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Move back to 12 and 22 and you might get both.
I would like to say that, that is insane, and we don't need both. But, sadly we do need both, and if Chubb is gone, I would probably do it.

Can you imagine the Colts defense w/Vander Esche at MIKE and Smith at WILL? We quickly go from the least athletic LB corps in the NFL, to arguably the most athletic.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-01-2018), VeveJones007 (04-01-2018)
  #77  
Old 04-01-2018, 05:06 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,229
Thanks: 2,975
Thanked 3,205 Times in 1,692 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiaColt View Post

Or one of the WR's, but I'm ambivalent about this group of receivers. Seems to be considerable quantity, but I'm not sure how much quality. Some big guys who may not run all that well, some fast guys with too many drops and/or lack of blocking ability. Would be nice to take some of the load off of Hilton, if possible.

If someone like Kirk or maybe Sutton is still there at the top of Round Two, I guess I'd give them a look, but otherwise I'm not sure there might not be a WR available at #49 or even #67 who's just as good as anyone earlier. Or another OL, or maybe a promising but under-achieving DT like Hand?
There are WR's that can be had in the 3rd or 4th round that would fit in nicely, DaeSean Hamilton and Simmie Cobbs are a couple, just off the top of my head.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (04-01-2018)
  #78  
Old 04-01-2018, 05:22 PM
ZiaColt ZiaColt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
There are WR's that can be had in the 3rd or 4th round that would fit in nicely, DaeSean Hamilton and Simmie Cobbs are a couple, just off the top of my head.
maybe a speed guy like Cain or Chark would still be there in the 3rd round; don't know if they'd last into the 4th round or not.

also St. Brown, though to me he's another guy (like Hand) who checks all the boxes on paper but sort of under-achieved in college--but some might argue that was a function of the offense he was in, not as much his own doing.

it's kind of a strange WR group this year: lotta guys I look at and go "mmmmaybe...." but no one (possibly even including Ridley) who really jumps out and says "sure-fire day-one starter" or "if he's still there at #36 or #37, ya gotta grab him"---especially given how many good OLs and DBs there are in this draft.

Last edited by ZiaColt; 04-01-2018 at 05:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 04-01-2018, 06:29 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiaColt View Post
as much as the Colts need LB help, it seems unlikely they'd draft 2 in the first round.

on the other hand, I can see the draft unfolding so that, at #12, Smith IS the "BPA" and, at #22, LVE is as well. And if Ballard really is a BPA guy then I guess he would go ahead and draft those 2, and maybe hope one of the OL's (Wynn, Hernandez, O'Neill, Rankin?) and possibly one of the CB's (Oliver, Alexander, Jackson, Davis?) are there at the top of Round Two as BPA's as well.

Or one of the WR's, but I'm ambivalent about this group of receivers. Seems to be considerable quantity, but I'm not sure how much quality. Some big guys who may not run all that well, some fast guys with too many drops and/or lack of blocking ability. Would be nice to take some of the load off of Hilton, if possible.

If someone like Kirk or maybe Sutton is still there at the top of Round Two, I guess I'd give them a look, but otherwise I'm not sure there might not be a WR available at #49 or even #67 who's just as good as anyone earlier. Or another OL, or maybe a promising but under-achieving DT like Hand?
I would be extremely happy with something like this in the first two rounds:

Roquon
Vander Esch
Will Hernandez
Hubbard
Michel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-01-2018)
  #80  
Old 04-01-2018, 06:31 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 8,088
Thanks: 1,853
Thanked 2,941 Times in 1,457 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesusChrist View Post
That would be stupid
Trading back for the 12 and 22 and Getting one of of Edmunds or Smith at 12 and then getting one of LVE Fitzpatrick James Landry Hurst Ridley Hernandez at 22 is smarter than taking Chubb.

Some of you are over infatuated with Chubb. He's good... he is not clearly the best player in the draft. And in previous drafts wouldnt even be in the discussion for the 6th pick.
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.