ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-27-2018, 08:37 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,174
Thanks: 22,037
Thanked 5,751 Times in 3,266 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I thought you were a free market type of person? Just because the Colts do a thing once doesn't mean they would have to do it again. Sure, players could ask, but a simple "no" ends it. It's not some sort of Pandora's Box.
It re-sets the market for RBs. Your explanation is lunacy, as usual
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-27-2018, 09:34 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
It re-sets the market for RBs. Your explanation is lunacy, as usual
I would argue it doesn't, especially since on the Colts end it would be an obvious ploy to get some use out of the cap dollars that they'd otherwise just have to send to the union, but the market for RBs is going to go up anyway. The cap in the very near future will exceed $200 million. Some RB in the next few years is going to get a contract that's not gimmicky and has a $15 million AAV.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-27-2018, 10:41 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,615
Thanks: 1,691
Thanked 4,816 Times in 1,973 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
That’s a little harsh. There is an argument that a multiple year all-pro running back might possibly help this offense. I don’t know the guy myself, but if he were to check out attitude wise, if you can protect the team if he does performance enhancing drugs, get him for a third and not hamstring yourself financially then I’d be that moron who thinks it’s worth a chance. We need playmakers
Let’s see

He wants more money than any rb in history. A good deal more

We can’t negotiate a new deal this year.

He is one strike away from being suspended a year for drugs

He is a malcontent and is holding out.

It isn’t harsh at all. Nobody should want this idiot on a young team like this.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
JAFF (09-27-2018), YDFL Commish (09-28-2018)
  #54  
Old 09-27-2018, 12:30 PM
GoBigBlue88 GoBigBlue88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 132
Thanked 1,180 Times in 356 Posts
Default

Honestly any objection I have is less about his attitude and more about just waiting a season and getting him without using a draft pick in the offseason.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-27-2018, 12:45 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
Honestly any objection I have is less about his attitude and more about just waiting a season and getting him without using a draft pick in the offseason.
If you don't care about the exclusive negotiating window, this is the best idea.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-27-2018, 03:29 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 340
Thanked 933 Times in 510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
If you don't care about the exclusive negotiating window, this is the best idea.
You would basically be giving up a 2nd for the opportunity to fully meet Bell’s ridiculous contract demands. Anything less than that and I don’t see him signing until he hits the market and see’s what his value will be. He seems to believe he will get it and has proven he’s committed to making sure he gets the opportunity. I don’t believe anyone will fully meet his demands so the Colts should have an opportunity to get him if they really want him. Personally I’m happy with the trio the Colts have and think there are plenty of better places to spend the money.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-27-2018, 04:00 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,480
Thanks: 2,787
Thanked 2,738 Times in 1,230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
Let’s see

He wants more money than any rb in history. A good deal more

We can’t negotiate a new deal this year.

He is one strike away from being suspended a year for drugs

He is a malcontent and is holding out.

It isn’t harsh at all. Nobody should want this idiot on a young team like this.
The fact that we can't negotiate a new deal makes me agree we should not give up a draft pick for him. The drug thing bothers me but not the malcontent crap. Nobody here knows the guy, opinions are generated by news that either the club or the players rep give. Neither is without suspicion. He has a limited time to make money and wants to maximize it. So he holds out. Never saw that coming from a professional athlete. I do know he would immediately be the best runner on the team, the best pass protecting back on the team and not only the best pass catching running back but one of the best pass catchers period on the team. He would improve the team immensely on the field. Ballard would be a fool not to look into this. Having said all of that, I come down on not giving up a draft pick for him.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-27-2018, 05:30 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
If you don't care about the exclusive negotiating window, this is the best idea.
This guy, in the most polite terms is a knucklehead.

And its' doubtful that will EVER change. Yeah, he can play football, when he's not neck deep in BS.

And how old is he? Investing in an old RB is like buying meat when it's 3 days past the expiration date. Oh, a knucklehead RB
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 09-27-2018, 05:32 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
The fact that we can't negotiate a new deal makes me agree we should not give up a draft pick for him. The drug thing bothers me but not the malcontent crap. Nobody here knows the guy, opinions are generated by news that either the club or the players rep give. Neither is without suspicion. He has a limited time to make money and wants to maximize it. So he holds out. Never saw that coming from a professional athlete. I do know he would immediately be the best runner on the team, the best pass protecting back on the team and not only the best pass catching running back but one of the best pass catchers period on the team. He would improve the team immensely on the field. Ballard would be a fool not to look into this. Having said all of that, I come down on not giving up a draft pick for him.
There is video of him recording his coach talking to the team. He's a twitter idiot. He's a dumbass. While I understand his talent, he is the reason he misses games.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (09-27-2018)
  #60  
Old 09-27-2018, 07:18 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,174
Thanks: 22,037
Thanked 5,751 Times in 3,266 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I would argue it doesn't, especially since on the Colts end it would be an obvious ploy to get some use out of the cap dollars that they'd otherwise just have to send to the union, but the market for RBs is going to go up anyway. The cap in the very near future will exceed $200 million. Some RB in the next few years is going to get a contract that's not gimmicky and has a $15 million AAV.
Of course you would
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.