#41
|
|||
|
|||
Honestly, I am more interested in trading to #3 than #1.
#3 "guarantees" one of your top 2 QB choices assuming CHI does not pick QB. I agree that pick #5 or below is not attractive to CHI as their chance to get one of the two prime defenders lowers greatly. I also think #4 is the lowest they would want to go no matter how big the haul of compensation. We will see, but who knows? Colts management might see AR-15 as the guy so....no movement needed with even a possible trade down a spot or three to still get him. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm of the feeling that Reich is going to try to convince Carolina management that he can win with either Darnold or Carr and that they don't need to move up for a QB. We all know how that will work out. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You might be right about SEA, but they're still an iffy one for me. Geno Smith also had a good year. But he's also a little older (33 next season) and in the six seasons prior to 2022, he's only had 15 total games and 5 starts. Of course he's also free agent, so we'll have a better idea when we see what kind of contract they offer him. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I really hope Colts brass doesn't think Richardson is the answer to anything but the question "How could the Ravens get out of paying Lamar Jackson while maintaining their current offensive system?" If they believe he is the answer to the Colts QB void, I suspect the current regime will learn the meaning of Not For Long. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hoopsdoc For This Useful Post: | ||
CletusPyle (02-17-2023), Racehorse (02-17-2023) |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Cardinals might too…Kyler Murray isn’t taking them anywhere!
__________________
"I went to Ancestry.com and Jim Bob Cooter and me are cousins!” |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
They are stuck with him after that contract they gave him.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dewey 5 For This Useful Post: | ||
CletusPyle (02-19-2023), Spike (02-19-2023) |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
This is exactly what they want you to think to drive up the price of the pick. They think Fields is the guy for now. Whether that's right or wrong is TBD (I think it's right), but either way they're not trading Fields because they wouldn't get good value. They'll get much better value trading the #1 pick.
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
He’s a poor man’s Lamar Jackson. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hoopsdoc For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|