#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That is absurd but ok |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I fully expect Freaks to freak out & meltdown when we don’t sign him. I would like to get him in Indy as much as everyone else here but there will be some team that will overpay for him & Ballard isn’t going to do that.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dewey 5 For This Useful Post: | ||
Indiana V2 (03-04-2019), Lawrence Owen (03-07-2019) |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Gonna win it all. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, that will likely be the case.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think the market will go much above 5/60/30. There's absolutely no reason the Colts couldn't afford that contract, including Ballard's preferred method of making all the guarantees happen in years 1 and 2. So the question is do the Colts think he's worth that? I could see that going either way. That said, there aren't many safeties his size with his athleticism, and maybe none in the upcoming draft class.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post: | ||
Dewey 5 (03-04-2019) |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Hooker can play the free safety role ok for a deep single high. Guys like Farley, geathers and Mitchell can function as ss or big nickel guy. Easy to bring them back.
We have zero top notch dline talent. Need more lbers. Depth at cb is not great to be nice. That front 7 needs a lot of help to be worried about the safeties much. But we do have a ton of cash and can improve a lot of places. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
It would give us one more pick in the draft to potentially use on the dline.
|
|
|