ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:29 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 8,526
Thanks: 2,234
Thanked 3,407 Times in 1,685 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
I really don't like the pick, and that's no slight to Nelson. I just think it's bad team-building strategy.

Taking the BPA is bad team building?

Nonsense
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Puck For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-26-2018), YDFL Commish (04-26-2018)
  #212  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:30 PM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,947
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 1,950 Times in 1,034 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
I absolutley expect one of our 2nd or 3rd rounders to be an RB. Mack is a nice back, but he is not going to be a feature back.
Chubb, Michel or Penny one should be there
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:31 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,341
Thanks: 9,721
Thanked 5,655 Times in 3,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiaColt View Post
As I said, I'm not thrilled but not especially upset either.

I'm not thrilled with the pick for the same reason as Polian, who clearly preferred Smith at #6. I personally would never use a #6 overall on any offensive linemen except a really gifted left tackle, and I'm not convinced Nelson at guard will have as much of a transformative effect on the Colts' entire offensive line as some expect, at least not immediately. We'll see.

But picking Nelson at #6 makes me wonder if Ballard doesn't have something else up his sleeve, possibly moving back up into the 1st round to grab someone like Evans, Landry or Davenport. Which could explain why he went with Nelson over Smith at #6.
In my opinion, there were only 3 players who I didn't have any reservations about. Chubb, Barkley and Nelson. And having the 6th pick in the draft, you can't fuck it up. Watch some videos on Nelson and you will see how fucking good he really is. He will open up running lanes and protect Luck, what more could you ask for? He is one of the most bad ass guards I have seen in a long time. He is a bad motherfucker. I truly believe he hates people.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
Puck (04-26-2018), smitty46953 (04-26-2018), Thorgrim (04-26-2018)
  #214  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:31 PM
ZiaColt ZiaColt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
I mostly agree with you. Number 6 needed a more game changing player than a guard can be. I just can't get to upset about top teir big uglys, so I can live with it if he ends up being what most pundits claim.
wonder if Ballard expects a "1st round quality" defensive player (LVE?) to slide down to #36 or #37?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZiaColt For This Useful Post:
Butter (04-26-2018)
  #215  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:33 PM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,947
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 1,950 Times in 1,034 Posts
Default

Saints trading up with Packers, think they want Davenport ?
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:34 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 894
Thanked 3,189 Times in 1,532 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
I really don't like the pick, and that's no slight to Nelson. I just think it's bad team-building strategy.
If he really is a generational talent as many are saying, then you have to take him. Lot of people thought he was the best overall player in this draft.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hoopsdoc For This Useful Post:
Puck (04-26-2018), Racehorse (04-26-2018), Spike (04-26-2018)
  #217  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:35 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,671
Thanks: 1,065
Thanked 2,805 Times in 1,452 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiaColt View Post
wonder if Ballard expects a "1st round quality" defensive player (LVE?) to slide down to #36 or #37?
Seems likely and we are in a good place to benefit.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:35 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,390
Thanks: 23,082
Thanked 5,943 Times in 3,380 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
If he really is a generational talent as many are saying, then you have to take him. Lot of people thought he was the best overall player in this draft.
I am cool with it, but Smith was my preferred player because our LBs were so awful and he is very very good.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post:
Coltsalr (04-26-2018), rcubed (04-26-2018)
  #219  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:37 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,876
Thanks: 653
Thanked 697 Times in 353 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey 5 View Post
Nelson very easily could be the best player in this draft. You're going to look back at this pick and be kissing Ballard's ass for making it.
Every time you're optimistic about something I check myself.

Yeah, I can talk myself into this one. He's going to be REALLY good.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Coltsalr For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (04-26-2018)
  #220  
Old 04-26-2018, 09:38 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,876
Thanks: 653
Thanked 697 Times in 353 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
I am cool with it, but Smith was my preferred player because our LBs were so awful and he is very very good.
My thoughts exactly.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Coltsalr For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-27-2018)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.