ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-25-2020, 10:49 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,104
Thanks: 299
Thanked 739 Times in 412 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierinFL View Post
I don't understand this mileage stuff. A lot of RBs come into the league with high # of attempts like that.
He's young and still has plenty of miles left. No reason we can't get 4-5 years of production out of him - and then we'll replace with with another young back same as we're doing with Mack. Plus even though he's suited to be an every down back, we're not going to use him like that. He's going to platoon with Mack, not to mention Hines and Wilkins.

Backs who came out of college with more carries than Taylor:
Ladainian Tomlinson
Tony Dorsett
Ricky Williams
Herschel Walker
Marcus Allen
Cedric Benson
Thurman Thomas
Even though I mentioned his workload, in general I agree. It’s a disposable position. The transition is fairly easy and you don’t sign guys to second contracts, you just find another one. However, the idea of it being a disposable position is also why I don’t like the value at 41 - especially trading up. Not a major thing by any means, just not what I was hoping for.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-25-2020, 11:17 AM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,904
Thanks: 3,282
Thanked 1,955 Times in 1,037 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierinFL View Post
I don't understand this mileage stuff. A lot of RBs come into the league with high # of attempts like that.
He's young and still has plenty of miles left. No reason we can't get 4-5 years of production out of him - and then we'll replace with with another young back same as we're doing with Mack. Plus even though he's suited to be an every down back, we're not going to use him like that. He's going to platoon with Mack, not to mention Hines and Wilkins.

Backs who came out of college with more carries than Taylor:
Ladainian Tomlinson
Tony Dorsett
Ricky Williams
Herschel Walker
Marcus Allen
Cedric Benson
Thurman Thomas
Just a couple good ones in that list
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to smitty46953 For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-25-2020)
  #13  
Old 04-25-2020, 11:31 AM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 934
Thanked 1,474 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierinFL View Post
I don't understand this mileage stuff. A lot of RBs come into the league with high # of attempts like that.
He's young and still has plenty of miles left. No reason we can't get 4-5 years of production out of him - and then we'll replace with with another young back same as we're doing with Mack. Plus even though he's suited to be an every down back, we're not going to use him like that. He's going to platoon with Mack, not to mention Hines and Wilkins.

Backs who came out of college with more carries than Taylor:
Ladainian Tomlinson
Tony Dorsett
Ricky Williams
Herschel Walker
Marcus Allen
Cedric Benson
Thurman Thomas

Agree. Bot worried about his carries as he will only need to be effective for us for 3-4 years then we get another, thats what the position has become. I hope he doesn’t have fumble issues as they seem high from college. But that can be taught.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-25-2020, 11:14 PM
bertjones's Avatar
bertjones bertjones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 91
Thanked 151 Times in 64 Posts
Default

Just for what it is worth, I saw a lot of him living up here in Wisconsin.
Every time he touched the ball you held your breath wondering whether
he would break it to the house. there aren't many players you can say that
about. I think he will be a surprisingly good receiving target, they upped
his catches this year but Cryst still was running an overly conservative
offense. Fumbles ARE an issue, it's why he wasn't a top 20 pick. This is where
Rathman earns his money.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bertjones For This Useful Post:
Coltsalr (04-26-2020), Dewey 5 (04-26-2020)
  #15  
Old 04-26-2020, 10:43 AM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,211
Thanks: 990
Thanked 2,251 Times in 1,174 Posts
Default

I feel conflicted on this pick, I think I will like the player if he cleans up the fumbles, I just hate not only using a 2nd on an RB, but trading up to do so. Ballard must really like him.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-26-2020, 04:57 PM
Dewey 5 Dewey 5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,828
Thanks: 2,659
Thanked 1,126 Times in 626 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bertjones View Post
Just for what it is worth, I saw a lot of him living up here in Wisconsin.
Every time he touched the ball you held your breath wondering whether
he would break it to the house. there aren't many players you can say that
about. I think he will be a surprisingly good receiving target, they upped
his catches this year but Cryst still was running an overly conservative
offense. Fumbles ARE an issue, it's why he wasn't a top 20 pick. This is where
Rathman earns his money.
I think he will be a much better receiving target in the NFL for the simple fact that Wisconsin didn't have a qb worth a piss.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:29 PM
daedge's Avatar
daedge daedge is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,464
Thanks: 247
Thanked 412 Times in 210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Now I remember that the fumbles were why I had him blacklisted.
Meh. Most of them were when he fighting for extra yardage. The Colts will coach it out of him.
__________________
2002, 2017 and 2019 Soda's Picks champion, 2003 Eliminator champion. Kiwi sports nut.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-26-2020, 05:31 PM
daedge's Avatar
daedge daedge is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,464
Thanks: 247
Thanked 412 Times in 210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
I feel conflicted on this pick, I think I will like the player if he cleans up the fumbles, I just hate not only using a 2nd on an RB, but trading up to do so. Ballard must really like him.
Must really have felt the Jaguars were going to take him. Given the Colts got the fifth round pick back, the fact we traded up doesn't really matter. After watching a 10 minute highlights package of him, I'm beyond content with the pick.
__________________
2002, 2017 and 2019 Soda's Picks champion, 2003 Eliminator champion. Kiwi sports nut.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daedge For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-26-2020), smitty46953 (04-26-2020)
  #19  
Old 04-26-2020, 06:42 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,441
Thanks: 2,058
Thanked 2,277 Times in 1,226 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bertjones View Post
Just for what it is worth, I saw a lot of him living up here in Wisconsin.
Every time he touched the ball you held your breath wondering whether
he would break it to the house. there aren't many players you can say that
about. I think he will be a surprisingly good receiving target, they upped
his catches this year but Cryst still was running an overly conservative
offense. Fumbles ARE an issue, it's why he wasn't a top 20 pick. This is where
Rathman earns his money.
I have lived in Wisconsin the last 4 years. Taylor may be the best RB to come out of the Badger program ever.

I was thinking today of a a pro-comp and I really couldn't come up with except maybe a bigger faster Terrell Davis.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
Coltsalr (04-26-2020), Ironshaft (04-26-2020), Racehorse (04-26-2020), smitty46953 (04-26-2020)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.