#1
|
||||
|
||||
RB by Committee
Interesting stat that the Indystar pulled on on Robert Turbin:
Quote:
However, I also keep hearing about the ability to move guys like Mack, Hines and Ferguson all over the field to get some "sizzle" out of them. That also is pretty exciting. So, it appears to me that we have 2 different types of RBs on the roster. Mack, Hines, Ferguson = "Get into Space and Sizzle" RBs Turbin, Wilkins, Michael = "Run between the Tackle" RBs If the O-Line is as improved as I think it could be, that is not a bad lineup to give Andrew weapons. There is a lot of talent there to work with (minus Turduson whom I just don't like). Walk Worthy,
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I would prefer to carry only 3 rbs. Although I don’t see it happening.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Ferguson is worthless. He should be gone by the end of camp.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Maniac For This Useful Post: | ||
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I can't imagine they will carry 6.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
No but we will probably carry 4. I like 3 unless the last dude is a good st guy
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Or a "rolling ball of butcher knives".
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Well Reich is seeing Turbin as 3-down back, which is nice to hear, esp if that means the line is playing well too
https://twitter.com/evansilva/status...60834136432647 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I think we carry 4 if Hines ends up returning and being used in a WR as well as 3rd down back. I just hope Turd is not one of them unless he has figured out how to do something well.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
At what point will we stop with this shit?
|
|
|