|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-20-2019, 11:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid. 
|
|
#2
01-20-2019, 10:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That was on obvious defensive holding. No need to act like it was a questionable call in the Chiefs favor, Romo.
Good thing, too, because the refs actually called that a fumble and you know it wouldn't have gotten overturned.
|
|
#3
01-20-2019, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Combination of some ref screwage for the Chiefs and an amazing catch by Hogan on 3rd down has the Pats back in front.
A combination of questionable officiating in the Cheats favor and semi-improbable plays made in big moments is why the Cheats dynasty just won't die.
|
|
#4
01-20-2019, 10:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
o
That is a rare case in which 2 penalties SHOULD be enforced on a play. The pass interference AND the roughing the passer. The reason being is that the PI call presumes that the receiver would have caught the ball if he had not been interfered with. The roughing the passer is a personal foul that occurred after the ball was released ........ so if you play out the events, both penalties should count, because if the receiver had caught the ball without being interfered with, they would have tacked on 15 more yards for roughing the passer. The defense should not be rewarded for a penalty, in which this case they were. o
__________________
BALTIMORE COLTS ))))))))))))))))))) INDIANAPOLIS COLTS Bert Jones, Johnny Unitas, Earl Morrall ))))))))).lll) Jim Harbaugh, Peyton Manning, Andrew Luck
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
