ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-24-2018, 01:38 PM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pez View Post
He's a wr2 on our team. Anyone who doesn't think he is better than Inman, Roger's or grant is not being honest.

As much as I think it's a bad idea and not a great fit long term, he will excel here.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
He would excel here, I don't doubt that

But the question is, is he worth the money he wants. And is it better to spend money on a RB when WR, secondary, pass rush are still huge needs for this team, much more so than RB.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-24-2018, 01:57 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
He would excel here, I don't doubt that

But the question is, is he worth the money he wants. And is it better to spend money on a RB when WR, secondary, pass rush are still huge needs for this team, much more so than RB.
Imagine if Nyheim Hines was bigger, could pass block, and had the ability to play every down. That's Le'veon Bell. By signing him, you're upgrading your WR group, and he's probably the best option for that this upcoming offseason outside of the draft, unless you don't mind age and like Golden Tate.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-24-2018, 01:58 PM
Luck4Reich's Avatar
Luck4Reich Luck4Reich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,555
Thanks: 1,974
Thanked 3,102 Times in 1,636 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
He would excel here, I don't doubt that

But the question is, is he worth the money he wants. And is it better to spend money on a RB when WR, secondary, pass rush are still huge needs for this team, much more so than RB.
I'm not leaning towards Bell but you do realize there is a possibility to add him and still have 80+ million in cap.space to.add plenty of talent elsewhere if available?

Last edited by Luck4Reich; 12-24-2018 at 02:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post:
TheMugwump (12-24-2018)
  #34  
Old 12-24-2018, 02:09 PM
TheMugwump's Avatar
TheMugwump TheMugwump is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,334
Thanks: 1,988
Thanked 2,153 Times in 1,197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
He is a playmaker. This team needs them and it is going to be difficult to get anyone who is the player Bell is where we are going to draft. I know he was a second round pick, but he is All-Pro. I know you can get by with someone 'off the streets' (Johnny Unitas was 'off the streets' after all) but I would rather add an All-Pro for money (nobody here know what it will take to sign the guy. I don't want us to break the bank but we should talk to the guy) and focus on defense in the draft
Love the Johnny U reference.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-24-2018, 02:14 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck View Post
I'm not leaning towards Bell but you do realize there is a possibility to add him and still have 80+ million in cap.space to.add plenty of WR and secondary talent?
The WR talent in free agency next year is terrible.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post:
Chromeburn (12-24-2018)
  #36  
Old 12-24-2018, 02:19 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,517
Thanks: 1,474
Thanked 3,876 Times in 2,165 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
The WR talent in free agency next year is terrible.
Yup, Bell is also probably the best receiver available as well. And we could split Bell out and still have Mack or Hines behind the QB.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-24-2018, 02:24 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
Yup, Bell is also probably the best receiver available as well. And we could split Bell out and still have Mack or Hines behind the QB.
There are so many creative things that could be done offensively with Bell and Hines on the field at the same time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-24-2018, 02:34 PM
Luck4Reich's Avatar
Luck4Reich Luck4Reich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,555
Thanks: 1,974
Thanked 3,102 Times in 1,636 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
The WR talent in free agency next year is terrible.
Not the point I was making there numbnuts.
The OP talked about not having money to spend on other positions if we signed Bell.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-24-2018, 02:46 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoLuck4Chuck View Post
Not the point I was making there numbnuts.
The OP talked about not having money to spend on other positions if we signed Bell.
It doesn't matter how much cap space you have to add to a position if there's no talent at the position worth adding.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-24-2018, 03:03 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

I don’t get the passion on either side of this debate.

Ballard’s history says he won’t sign Bell for the money he wants.

Just about everyone agrees Bell has proven he is a great player.

We have an embarrassment of cap space.

If Ballard did sign him, it would be a departure from what Ballard has done so far.

If Ballard did sign him, he would probably excel here and be very exciting to watch.

If Ballard signs him, IMO he’s earned enough credit to get the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think he will ruin the team’s culture to sign Bell. If he thinks Bell is a good player to bring in, I’ll believe that until I have a reason to stop.

If Ballard doesn’t sign him, our offense will probably still be very exciting to watch, and will be improved next year. And we’ll have that much more money to use elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FatDT For This Useful Post:
Luck4Reich (12-24-2018), Racehorse (12-24-2018)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.