#11
|
|||
|
|||
I can't see the Giants not selecting Justin Herbert.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know if any of the QBs are top ten worthy. I agree they need a QB. But they won't force it. They really really need oline and there are about 3-4 guys that could be in the top 15 for LT.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Obviously without seeing the specifics of any deal I can’t fully say, but I find this general idea absurd. Not saying Ballard wouldn’t do it, but that it makes absolutely no sense to me after staying put and drafting Nelson at 6 last year. You don’t then trade down the next draft when elite level players at impact positions are available. I don’t see how you can justify passing on Oliver or Bosa for more picks when you refused to do it with Nelson (a guard) at 6. Unless someone offers a Ricky Williams type deal of course.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Disagree. Ballard showed last year he is all about the lines. This DL class is loaded. If Ballard has a Top 5 pick, he will stay put and get Bosa or Oliver.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post: | ||
VeveJones007 (10-15-2018) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
This is what would happen, but this whole discussion is moot. The Colts won't be drafting Top 5.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Haha, no. But I do freely admit that I tend to exaggerate a lot.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I do hope though, that if we end up drafting at/near the top again that we use it on a more impactful player/position. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My list is AZ, SF, NYG, OAK, maybe BUF, maybe CLE. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
They will if they keep playing like they did yesterday.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|