![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe drafting the correct intersection of BPA and need is the best idea.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
All teams draft BPA according to their board, and lots of people will disagree with each other about who is best. It's a dumb argument.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
My strategy would be to get a BPA ranking from all of my staff and then when it comes to the draft pick, take the BPA, unless it's in a position you're already strong in. If that's the case, trade down.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes trade if possible... but what if you cant trade? Take the player you want even if he's graded at 8-10 players later, or do you take BPA at another position?
__________________
Gonna win it all. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In the first round, my guess is that the round is grouped AT LEAST into thirds. Top ten, middle ten, bottom third. Finding someone as BPA from your general position is probably pretty easy unless you only judge 10 guys as 1st round talent which I don't think is the case in this draft class. However, in lower rounds, how closely do you think they group folks? By round? By half round (top half 3rd round, bottom half 3rd round)? By third of a round still? Your comment of grading someone 10 slots later than your pick. I just wonder how closely the NFL teams grade folks. Cheers,
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! ![]() ![]()
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|