![]() |
|
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
|
I Am a build the lines and defense guy. A rb and wr in the 2nd and 3rd is not my ideal draft
|
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree, Build the lines and the rest will follow. Franchise QB is clealy the first thing, but we have that.
|
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
My guess is:
1) Browns - QB1 2) Giants - QB2 3) Jets - QB3 4) Browns - Barkley 5) Broncos - QB4 6) Colts - Chubb |
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not going to happen |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great reasoning there, your argument is quite compelling.
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post: | ||
sherck (03-17-2018), VeveJones007 (03-17-2018) | ||
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont think giants go QB. If CLE thinks they will go barkley 2 then CLE may still go barkley 1 and QB at 4. I read and heard on radio the giants like chubb.
|
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Besides, I was advocating Michel, OL, OL in the 2nd. |
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think Chubb could very well be there at 6. Dismissing it out of hand is foolish.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|