ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #491  
Old Yesterday, 02:46 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 2,982
Thanked 2,947 Times in 1,337 Posts
Default

It is early but I cannot see how we have improved at all. We are now weaker at linebacker (hard to believe), wide receiver, have no swing tackle and still don't have a pass rusher. That a lot of stuff to address. Been here before many times with this particular group that runs us now, thought they had a plan and turned out there was none. I hope there is one now but I believe that there probably isn't (not trying to be negative but I have believed so many times before and was always disappointed).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oldcolt For This Useful Post:
ChoppedWood (Yesterday)
  #492  
Old Yesterday, 02:55 PM
ChoppedWood ChoppedWood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,555
Thanks: 4,589
Thanked 3,062 Times in 1,687 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
It is early but I cannot see how we have improved at all. We are now weaker at linebacker (hard to believe), wide receiver, have no swing tackle and still don't have a pass rusher. That a lot of stuff to address. Been here before many times with this particular group that runs us now, thought they had a plan and turned out there was none. I hope there is one now but I believe that there probably isn't (not trying to be negative but I have believed so many times before and was always disappointed).
The linebacker group- oh my God that is poverty shit.

Ballard eats balls!
Reply With Quote
  #493  
Old Yesterday, 03:07 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,391
Thanks: 877
Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,501 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
It is early but I cannot see how we have improved at all. We are now weaker at linebacker (hard to believe), wide receiver, have no swing tackle and still don't have a pass rusher. That a lot of stuff to address. Been here before many times with this particular group that runs us now, thought they had a plan and turned out there was none. I hope there is one now but I believe that there probably isn't (not trying to be negative but I have believed so many times before and was always disappointed).
Hard to disagree with this. The only place we are objectively better is defensive tackle. Everything else is the same or worse.
Reply With Quote
  #494  
Old Yesterday, 08:39 PM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,988
Thanks: 614
Thanked 2,462 Times in 1,134 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
Hard to disagree with this. The only place we are objectively better is defensive tackle. Everything else is the same or worse.
How you frame it in your mind matters. A lot of people will say, as they have in years past, that Ballard sat on his hands and didn't get any difference makers. Because for some reason, Free Agents don't count if they were on your team last year.

The more accurate framing is that you likely got the #1 QB and the #1 WR available in the '26 FA class. Just pretend one came from Cincinnati and one came from Tampa Bay if it helps. And to do stuff like that, you don't get to keep your other $20m+ WR.

---

Anyway, to the substance of the point... I fucking hate losing Cross. As excited as I was for Wohler, that one will probably sting. Hopefully he's the rare type to be reliable right away.

LB is funny... Because it's simultaneously the biggest unknown and also one of the least worrisome positions to me personally. I guess it's the combination of ease of transition from college to pro, Lou's emphasis on DBs, and Ballard's track record at LB.

I think DL will be hammered in the draft. May luck into Grover's replacement, otherwise depth behind him and Buckner.
Reply With Quote
  #495  
Old Today, 04:48 AM
Mr. Session's Avatar
Mr. Session Mr. Session is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 872
Thanks: 380
Thanked 714 Times in 328 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
It is early but I cannot see how we have improved at all. We are now weaker at linebacker (hard to believe), wide receiver, have no swing tackle and still don't have a pass rusher. That a lot of stuff to address. Been here before many times with this particular group that runs us now, thought they had a plan and turned out there was none. I hope there is one now but I believe that there probably isn't (not trying to be negative but I have believed so many times before and was always disappointed).
I see the same

I guess it makes the draft interesting. I don't know how they fill the holes either.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Session For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (Today)
  #496  
Old Today, 09:02 AM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,391
Thanks: 877
Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,501 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosTheory View Post
How you frame it in your mind matters. A lot of people will say, as they have in years past, that Ballard sat on his hands and didn't get any difference makers. Because for some reason, Free Agents don't count if they were on your team last year.

The more accurate framing is that you likely got the #1 QB and the #1 WR available in the '26 FA class. Just pretend one came from Cincinnati and one came from Tampa Bay if it helps. And to do stuff like that, you don't get to keep your other $20m+ WR.

---

Anyway, to the substance of the point... I fucking hate losing Cross. As excited as I was for Wohler, that one will probably sting. Hopefully he's the rare type to be reliable right away.

LB is funny... Because it's simultaneously the biggest unknown and also one of the least worrisome positions to me personally. I guess it's the combination of ease of transition from college to pro, Lou's emphasis on DBs, and Ballard's track record at LB.

I think DL will be hammered in the draft. May luck into Grover's replacement, otherwise depth behind him and Buckner.
Or, you could frame it as we resigned two of the guys who helped lead us to an 8-9 record and no playoffs while letting their supporting cast get significantly worse.

That’s a more accurate representation.
Reply With Quote
  #497  
Old Today, 11:00 AM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 2,982
Thanked 2,947 Times in 1,337 Posts
Default

I thought the idea of free agency was to improve your team. I am not sure how assuring you bring back the exact same players improve your team. I am glad (sort of , not thrilled about Jones but it is the best we can do) we signed who we wanted to but doing that isn't improving your team, it is making sure it doest get worse.
Reply With Quote
  #498  
Old Today, 11:34 AM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 8,510
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 3,333 Times in 1,672 Posts
Default

Spotrac
@spotrac
·
1h
6 Indianapolis #Colts players had contract triggers vest this weekend:

CB Charvarius Ward’s $12.9M 2026 salary now guaranteed

DL DeForest Buckner earned a $10M roster bonus

S Cam Bynum’s $10M 2026 salary now guaranteed

$8.3M of OL Bernhard Raimann’s 2027 salary now guaranteed

OL Quenton Nelson earned a $2M roster bonus

WR/KR Ashton Dulin earned a $340,000 roster bonus
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
  #499  
Old Today, 11:48 AM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,988
Thanks: 614
Thanked 2,462 Times in 1,134 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
Or, you could frame it as we resigned two of the guys who helped lead us to an 8-9 record and no playoffs while letting their supporting cast get significantly worse.

That’s a more accurate representation.
The entire Colts universe just shit their pants for a month at the thought of Alec Pierce being lost to free agency. Are we going to act like he's a mediocre cog now?

And Daniel Jones did not lead us to 8-9. We were 8-2 before the leg break and just about every advanced metric had him at least top-5, if not leading.

---

As far as the supporting cast - I agree, we lost some guys that I hated to see go. Particularly Pittman, Cross, Smith, and even Paye (run D will be missed).

But saying "let" implies something that isn't there. Keep in mind, this is the GM and FO that constantly gets mocked for the "we like our guys" mantra. Not like don't try to keep them. It's a zero-sum game and QB/WR are two of the big-3 paid positions.

Not directed at you, but I do find it amusing to read a lot of guys who like to mock the "we like our guys", but are now complaining when we have to let our guys go.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
I thought the idea of free agency was to improve your team. I am not sure how assuring you bring back the exact same players improve your team. I am glad (sort of , not thrilled about Jones but it is the best we can do) we signed who we wanted to but doing that isn't improving your team, it is making sure it doest get worse.
I think the natural thinking makes it feel counterintuitive to consider them "additions"... but neither Jones nor Pierce were on the team after the season ended. That's your starting point.

Without that starting point, all of the subtractions and comparatively smaller signings are out of context. Then it looks like you just let a bunch of starters walk out the door for no reason other than to sign a bunch of smaller contract guys. That's not the case.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ChaosTheory For This Useful Post:
Puck (Today)
  #500  
Old Today, 12:39 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 2,982
Thanked 2,947 Times in 1,337 Posts
Default

Chaos, I was comparing the team we put on the field last year with the team we will put on the field next year, not a hypothetical team that has 'lost' every free agent. Keeping the best players on your team is now what we cheer for? For me the question is, and it is the ONLY one that counts in my opinion, is have you actually improved the team you put on the field last year? These moves (Pierce, DJ) didn't move the needle an inch, they just kept it from nosediving. I am glad we got it done, it would have been a disaster otherwise. I am rooting for you to be correct. There is still time and I am just venting on how I think it is going so far, which is not so great.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.