ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2023, 07:01 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,664
Thanks: 1,060
Thanked 2,797 Times in 1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Spending $60 million per year on the QB position is going to be the norm in the NFL.
He is not going to sign a contract that we get easy out of after 2 years, that was my point, more than the per year.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2023, 09:59 AM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,709
Thanks: 3,008
Thanked 2,973 Times in 1,351 Posts
Default

I’m reading more and more that we like Levis. Smokescreen or is it possible that the scouting department knows more than Dam?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oldcolt For This Useful Post:
CletusPyle (04-02-2023)
  #3  
Old 04-02-2023, 12:08 PM
Lov2fish's Avatar
Lov2fish Lov2fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,127
Thanks: 861
Thanked 1,181 Times in 529 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
I’m reading more and more that we like Levis. Smokescreen or is it possible that the scouting department knows more than Dam?
Is that possible?
__________________
Life is hard, its harder if you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lov2fish For This Useful Post:
CletusPyle (04-02-2023), Racehorse (04-03-2023)
  #4  
Old 04-02-2023, 05:19 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,165 Times in 1,227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
He is not going to sign a contract that we get easy out of after 2 years, that was my point, more than the per year.
No, you take the Rodgers track at that point. Have Lamar for 4 years, cut him year 5, you learn if Richardson is your QBOTF on the fifth year option.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2023, 05:27 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,165 Times in 1,227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
I’m reading more and more that we like Levis. Smokescreen or is it possible that the scouting department knows more than Dam?
I hope it's a smokescreen, I would honestly think Ballard & Co. would get Wentz flashbacks watching Levis's tape. Given the timing of it it makes sense for it to be a smokescreen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lov2fish View Post
Is that possible?
Every NFL scouting department has a greater knowledge base on every draft class than any person that isn't in an NFL scouting department, a fact I've pointed out on several occasions. No one else gets to interview them or look at their medical records.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2023, 11:00 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 2,699
Thanked 1,676 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I hope it's a smokescreen, I would honestly think Ballard & Co. would get Wentz flashbacks watching Levis's tape. Given the timing of it it makes sense for it to be a smokescreen.



Every NFL scouting department has a greater knowledge base on every draft class than any person that isn't in an NFL scouting department, a fact I've pointed out on several occasions. No one else gets to interview them or look at their medical records.
I don’t think it’s a smoke screen and while I disagree with the Wentz comparison before the injury he was playing MVP ball and was the 2nd pick in the draft. No need to hide anything at this point Levis seems to be the 4th choice for most teams if a team trades up they’d probably be gambling on Richardson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2023, 11:30 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,664
Thanks: 1,060
Thanked 2,797 Times in 1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
No, you take the Rodgers track at that point. Have Lamar for 4 years, cut him year 5, you learn if Richardson is your QBOTF on the fifth year option.
I would fucking hope we wouldn't do that with the 4th pick, you take Lamarr you are building around him, too big an investment to be a long bridge, that is insane.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Butter For This Useful Post:
Ironshaft (04-03-2023)
  #8  
Old 04-03-2023, 12:03 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,165 Times in 1,227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
I would fucking hope we wouldn't do that with the 4th pick, you take Lamarr you are building around him, too big an investment to be a long bridge, that is insane.
They play a similar style, whether you take Lamar or Richardson you're committing to building the same style of offense, so why not take both?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-03-2023, 12:38 AM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,664
Thanks: 1,060
Thanked 2,797 Times in 1,447 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
They play a similar style, whether you take Lamar or Richardson you're committing to building the same style of offense, so why not take both?
Because it would be stupid when that pick could be a stud player that helps the team win the next 4 years, rather than a QB with a high bust potential.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Butter For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (04-03-2023), JAFF (04-03-2023)
  #10  
Old 04-03-2023, 01:48 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,517
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,165 Times in 1,227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
Because it would be stupid when that pick could be a stud player that helps the team win the next 4 years, rather than a QB with a high bust potential.
Well they're not trading to 1, at least they've made no indication of doing so as of yet, so they've already committed to a QB with high bust potential unless they go with Anderson or Carter. But doing that without Lamar is a huge risk.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.