|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
No question, but just trying (perhaps unsuccessfully) to poke a little fun. Whenever people talk about long arms I immediately think about Chubbs' freakishly long right forearm capped with that crudely carved wooden hand. I realize Happy Gilmore isn't to everyone's taste, but to me it's a classic. Better than Caddyshack (let the flaming begin!).
Last edited by Chaka; 04-17-2019 at 12:53 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Chaka For This Useful Post: | ||
Coltsalr (04-18-2019) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Unless a 40 time is involved Dam isnt having fun. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
On the eternal Caddyshack vs. Happy Gilmore debate, Caddyshack was a good movie, but I never cared much for the Bill Murray character chasing around the puppet gopher. Sacrilegious, I know. I liked everything else about the movie, though. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Discflinger For This Useful Post: | ||
JAFF (04-17-2019), TheMugwump (04-19-2019) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
That's what most people say when I say that, so you're not alone. To me, Caddyshack's a good movie, but overrated a little for the reasons I stated. Happy Gilmore is pretty much great from beginning to end.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I have never even seen caddyshack.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If you take out Rodney Dangerfield's character, then maybe Happy Gilmore is better. However, he IS in the movie and pure comic genius, so it's not even close to Sandler's best version of his baby-talking schtick.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Colt Classic For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (04-18-2019) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|