View Single Post
  #69  
Old 01-04-2018, 03:03 PM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,599
Thanks: 233
Thanked 984 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
30 games / 1,169 attempts / 0,711 completions / 60.8% / 09,301 yards / 059 TD / 26 INT / 139.9 College QB Rating / 6'4" / 218 lbs / Josh Rosen, UCLA
27 games / 0,846 attempts / 0,539 completions / 64.9% / 07,229 yards / 057 TD / 22 INT / 153.7 College QB Rating / 6'4" / 220 lbs / Sam Darnold, USC
27 games / 0,649 attempts / 0,365 completions / 56.2% / 05,066 yards / 044 TD / 21 INT / 137.7 College QB Rating / 6'5" / 233 lbs / Josh Allen, Wyoming
48 games / 1,429 attempts / 1,026 completions / 68.5% / 14,607 yards / 131 TD / 30 INT / 175.4 College QB Rating / 6'1" / 220 lbs / Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma
38 games / 1,086 attempts / 0,619 completions / 57.0% / 09,043 yards / 069 TD / 27 INT / 142.9 College QB Rating / 6'3" / 211 lbs / Lamar Jackson, Louisville
42 games / 1,447 attempts / 0,915 completions / 63.2% / 13,618 yards / 092 TD / 26 INT / 159.7 College QB Rating / 6'5" / 230 lbs / Mason Rudolph, Oklahoma State

I honestly could see NFL teams falling in love with any of those 6 guys and wanting him to be "their" guy and going and trading up to get him.

Sure, Darnold and Rosen may go #1 and #2....but Mayfield, Allen, Jacksona nd Rudolph are also as viable of franchise QB candidates as the other two.

I could easily see all six guys going in the top 15 picks of the draft.

And, I could see the Colts being able to trade down multiple times to end up in the middle of the draft with a ton of O-Linemen or defensive picks on the board with Top Ten grades and multiple 2nd round picks.

Who knows, but all 6 of those QBs make a case to fall in love with their potential.

Walk Worthy,
Rosen and Darnold are coveted much higher than the rest. True, the others can have teams wanting them, but I don't think a King's ransom would be given for them. A decent 1 and a 4 maybe, but not much more.
Reply With Quote