View Single Post
  #425  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:55 PM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,726
Thanks: 2,143
Thanked 2,538 Times in 1,489 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
The challenge was the right call. Risk/reward of getting it was high enough when you only need two TOs.
If there was a chance in hell they'd win the challenge ok, it was the right call.

When there wasn't, it was extremely idiotic. The odds of having more time with that extra timeout was far more valuable than challenging a call that had a 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000001% chance of being overturned.

Though with that pathetic display of defense at the end it feels like a pointless argument.
__________________
Free of Frank!
Reply With Quote