Thread: Commish's Take
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 09-29-2020, 06:30 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,927
Thanks: 17,116
Thanked 4,396 Times in 2,529 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Session View Post
I think Foster is a good "ceiling" for Taylor. I think Foster was more elusive but the comparison still holds imo. I've been worried about him too, but I find it encouraging he's had as many 5-10 yard runs as he's had.

I think Mack's absence is starting to show a little. Mack has the ability to hit the homerun on some of these plays and Taylor just hasn't shown that yet. At this point I would argue there's no reason to believe Taylor has more ability to break off the explosion plays than Wilson. Honestly I have a hard time seeing where Taylor is more desirable than Wilson other than his age. Wilson is literally doing everything Taylor has but has also proven he can rip off 50 yard runs.

He's definitely not Trent Richardson. Hopefully things start to click.
Who is Wilson?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post:
AlwaysSunnyinIndy (09-30-2020), Puck (09-29-2020)