View Single Post
  #25  
Old 04-02-2018, 09:43 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 340
Thanked 933 Times in 510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I can't see Edmunds being the 4th guy, I might have him as the 4th best LB. I know his measurables are off the charts, but his tape shows a stiff hipped two down thumper who will struggle to cover NFL TEs. I could've watched the four worst games of his career, but that's unlikely, and he consistently displayed those traits in every game. The tape is why I'm so high on Chubb. No other defender in this class that I've seen to date has the ability to dominate and take over a game, where he does.
I don’t watch much college ball and I certainly don’t break down game tape so admittedly my knowledge of the players in the draft is primarily limited to other people’s scouting reports. I see Edmunds as the possible 4th player only because of the sky high potential most reports rave about with him and my belief Ballard is taking a longer term view for building the roster. I have no idea if that potential is real or not. Personally from my limited knowledge I’d prefer Chubb as well.
Reply With Quote