Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka
Certainly individual player moves are fair game for criticism - as to such moves, however, I think you have to evaluate the moves in the larger context of the salary cap rules and the stated goals of the organization. So many of the criticisms center upon the loss of a good player (Hankins/Melvin) without any discussion of the cost that keeping the player would entail - both in dollar amount and length of contract. For a GM, these are paramount considerations - I'm sure Ballard would agree that both of those players are valuable, but he's determined that they aren't worth what it would cost the Colts (given their schemes) to keep them. He's said as much in his interviews.
As to the larger question of criticizing the entire offseason, I wholeheartedly disagree with you. To label the offseason a failure at this point is way too premature. There is much more that will be done before the season begins.
|
I’m not sure how Ballard isn’t open to criticism for the Hankins situation. It was his signature signing last year. And it’s now his coaching staff that didn’t feel it could utilize an above average 26 yr old at the price Ballard signed him for. One year later. It was his decision on a talent starved roster to let go of a 26 yr old above average performer on a decent and relatively short term contract (2 more years). Instead of running with Hankins next year to see how the fit was they decided to save money. Money they have no intentions to spend. And money they in no way need. Is there some young guy behind Hankins who needs playing time the old washed up vet (at 26?)was stealing? I don’t see one.
Yes Ballard didn’t think he was worth it. That much is obvious. I don’t see how that in itself makes it logical. Especially if Ballard is really concerned with competing short term as you like to suggest.