View Single Post
  #588  
Old 05-25-2026, 03:10 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,459
Thanks: 2,745
Thanked 1,695 Times in 945 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
The problem with Downs replacing Pittman’s production is that someone else would have to replace Downs's production.

Like I said before, I think it can be done in the aggregate, but it will be something like Pierce catching 15 more, Downs catching 20 more, Warren catching 20 more, and 35 more catches going to that other group of 4 WRs I mentioned previously. That's how the team could conceivably replace Pittman’s 80 catches without bringing another high end receiver in.
Or just give Pierce 80-100 more targets and call it a day
Reply With Quote