Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Session
I'm higher on our TE room than most I guess. I think they offer the organization a nice skill set and I'm a sucker for the run game and I appreciate all of those guys are completely find with force feeding a defender some turf. If Warren goes down they might be fucked though, so I concede that.
I am wondering what's going to happen with Taylor's contract. The team/organization doesn't need that drama imo, just pay that guy in a way that's good for us or that makes it easier to trade him. I really don't want to see his agent talking shit again.
I think that a health Downs is going to replace Pittman's production. I don't think he'll block like Pitt but I think he'll put up #'s in the pass game.
To me, the Defense still has the most question marks. Anarumo facilitating growth in that regard, to me at least, is highly important. If there is regression that is going to be awful, awful, awful for Ballard. I am excited to see what LB's we trot out there next year. We should see a whole new crew at this piont.
|
The problem with Downs replacing Pittman’s production is that someone else would have to replace Downs's production.
Like I said before, I think it can be done in the aggregate, but it will be something like Pierce catching 15 more, Downs catching 20 more, Warren catching 20 more, and 35 more catches going to that other group of 4 WRs I mentioned previously. That's how the team could conceivably replace Pittman’s 80 catches without bringing another high end receiver in.