Quote:
Originally Posted by ChoppedWood
Inherent in my post, would be what I would do- fucking what any GM not named Chris Ballard would do- not sign these two and sign other FA's which are better than them; we HAVE to change this damn culture and create some uncomfortableness at every damn position. Telling a couple old timers that have had good careers but haven't been top level performers of late that they have to go, is a good way to start that process.
I'm not the GM, I don't have the financial modeling in front of me, I don't have access to 22 film for every player in the NFL, and those coming into the NFL, that Chris fucking lazy as fuck Ballard has. So, am I capable of doing the evaluations Chris Ballard and his TEAM are equipped to do in order to say who that means I sign, fuck no. But to answer your fucking obtuse question, I would do what I infer in my post- not bring these two back, along with probably greater than 50% of the half assed effort entitled B level players this fucking asshole has propped up as NFL all-timers.
But alas, we will continue to Ballard for another 330 days or so and be back here at this time next year wondering why we didn't sign "X", "Y", or "Z" instead... pay attention dumb ass, this is the wash rinse repeat cycle we live in under FBF and why we suck over and over.
|
So you're not willing to actually express an opinion of your own, all you can do is bitch about how poorly Ballard is doing?
So those two guys you want to replace, Kelly and Smith, do you know why it's possible to replace them without spending most of the remaining cap space to do it? Because Ballard drafted a starting caliber RT and C in rounds 3 and 4 last year. I know you wouldn't do that.
If you're not actually willing to have an opinion about what should be done differently, then you should just quit your bitching, because the team certainly wouldn't be better off if they did what you want them to.