Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369
It’s strange - when we argued about Polian the only thing that mattered to you was wins and losses. And the fact it was done with Manning was largely irrelevant. Polian was an obvious genius because of his wins and losses. Now on Ballard, wins and losses means nothing and his QB situation is critical in analyzing his performance.
|
That's hilarious because I'm the least single-issue minded person you'll come across. I've had guys bitch at me for getting too bogged down in the details, even you I believe. I've never had somebody say my argument is too narrow. You either didn't read my posts or are intentionally omitting details. The first bold text, for example, is such a mischaracterization that it basically qualifies as made up.
And the second bold is a similar example of mischaracterizing where you take things to ridiculous extremes.
The rest of your post is stuff we've scrapped over already. We disagree. I think your premise is wrong. Going back to the original point of bringing up Polian's record in our previous conversation... even if this team drafts a great QB in '23 and begins a run of 10 years of success akin to the 2000's Colts, that won't be good enough for you.
You won't view Ballard in a positive light until he signs a bunch of big names from other teams. And it's not like it's about whether those moves work out or not... you'll say, "At least he took his shot."