
09-07-2017, 08:55 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,931
Thanks: 2,561
Thanked 1,522 Times in 668 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic
When your so far under the cap like the Colts are it's inexcusable to roll with garbage behind Luck. There are always decent backups available in the offseason, yet they continue to pick guys who seem to be good thinkers at QB instead of guys who can actually come in and do something when the need arises.
|
From an earlier thread:
Quote:
Not to be a downer, but whom would you have signed?
Mike Glennon and Jay Cutler all making more than $10m for 2017. Just a bit outside our price range for a backup QB.
Landry Jones (whom I like) stayed with the same team without negotiating with anyone else.
QBs over 30 (Ballard would probably have avoided): Josh McCown, Brian Hoyer, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Mark Sanchez, Josh Johnson, Joe Webb, Chase Daniels, T.J. Yates, Dan Orlovsky, Shaun Hill, Bruce Gradkowski and Charlie Whitehead.
Matt Barkley (26 years old) was available. Nick Foles (28 years old) was available.However, both those guys wanted a chance to challenge for starter duties. Not happening in Indy.
The Remaining guys:
Case Keenum
Geno Smith
Blaine Gabbert
Austin Davis
Matt McGloin
E.J. Manuel
Thaddeus Lewis
Ryan Nassib
Kellen Moore
David Fales
Aaron Murray
Colin Kaepernick
RGIII
Christian Pounder
Zach Mettenberger
Keith Wenning
Dylan Thompson
Sean Renfree
Which one of those world beaters would you have said, prior to free agency starting, is heads and shoulders better than Scott Tolzien?
|
It is easy to throw darts without looking it up, but seriously, which one of those guys would you have felt better about than Tolzien (who had a solid 2016 season) who was under 30? Which one?
I hate Tolzien from his 2017 performance but I think just about everyone was pretty comfortable with him prior to about a month ago.
Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!  
|