View Single Post
  #330  
Old 04-05-2022, 07:31 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 338
Thanked 919 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
…….. If he wants to try to make a run at a SB this year, which considering the age of our QB he should, then he's going to have to restructure some contracts and add some quality FAs. I'm not sure why that's so hard to understand.
It wouldn’t be hard for them to understand if Ballard did it. Then it would become the correct thing to do and make perfect sense. It’s the questioning that’s the issue.

The only fault in your logic is the “if he wants to try to make a run at a SB this year”. I honestly don’t think he does, at least not at the expense of future years. He wants a SB but I think he believes in the idea of being a really good team for as long as possible and good things will happen. It is certainly possible to win a SB that way, but I don’t think it’s the correct way to go about it. People consistently bring up Polian in defense of Ballard’s methods, but I personally see it as an indictment instead. Polian had, IMO, the best QB to ever play the game and won one SB. They were consistently really, really good though. They could have been less consistent and had higher peaks to go with the lower valleys. Now imagine that Ballard has / is building the same thing without that level of QB. He won’t mortgage the future for a shot now. Not unless Irsay dictates it. According to reports he was willing to miss on Ryan to give a 4th instead of a 3rd. He’ll win every transaction, but still lose (what is for me) the big picture.

Last edited by rm1369; 04-05-2022 at 08:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (04-05-2022), Ironshaft (04-05-2022)