
08-25-2017, 12:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 155
Thanked 619 Times in 365 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by albany ed
If the Colts were to sign a QB, I'd much rather it be Kaepernick than Osweiler. I don't care about K's politics. Hell, I want Luck, but if he's going to be out for half the season, then give me a QB that can excite me. Kaepernick can do that, Osweiler can't. Win or lose, Kaepernick generates excitement and entertainment, and that's what I watch football to see.
I don't see it happening, because Irsay, like most owners is concerned about the bottom line. If signing Kaepernick would mean a fan lo$$ at the turnstiles, then it won't happen. I don't believe most owners really care about the politics of this, they'd sign him if they thought it would boost their revenue. As Ali once said, some people bought a ticket to his fights to see him win, others bought a ticket to see him get his butt whupped, but as long as they bought tickets, he was happy.
|
I agree Kaepernick > Osweiler.
Signing Kaepernick would lose zero fans...keeping Tolzien on the other hand...
|