View Single Post
  #6  
Old 08-15-2017, 12:49 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,938
Thanks: 17,192
Thanked 4,423 Times in 2,536 Posts
Default

I almost started a thread and just put in one sentence about my thoughts (The sentence was this: It was a preseason game that does not matter), but since there is a thread, I'll add a few things.

1. Pope seemed to have good burst and vision. I want to see more from him to see what we have there.

2. Whoever #6 is, he seems to be able to make some plays and needs to get reps next week to see what we have there.

3. The defense is improved. I want to see how they do for a full game, but it seems to not be e leaky sieve anymore.

4. No way to judge the offense without Luck or any starting WRs or Kelly, but I'll say Tolzien should be QB4 based on this game. he looked horrid.

5. Sanchez is not an option at P, but Locke looks to be as good as the top punters in the league.

6. The DLine looked to be able to stop the run pretty well. Not sure what the stats showed, but I cannot remember many run plays that went for much.

7. The OLine was missing key parts, but made it possible for Pope and others to run the ball. Their pass protection was not good at all. Maybe it is just that Walker is short, but the other two didn't fare much better when it comes to batted passes.

8. The new FA players on defense were very much an upgrade.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post:
apballin (08-15-2017)