View Single Post
  #33  
Old 10-10-2021, 04:05 PM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,233
Thanks: 2,572
Thanked 3,144 Times in 1,819 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
This would be completely different than sitting Wentz to protect our first. We wouldn't be fucking a teammate to begin with. Doubt that Irsay, Ballard or Reich would go for such a thing but I couldn't care less if we did. If Phili wanted assurances that Wentz would play if healthy they should have put it into the deal. I'm not sure why people think we owe it to Phili to play Wentz. Where is that written?
I don't understand this rationale at all. The idea of trading a potential first for Wentz is that he's worth the pick. If he plays and the Colts suck to the point they aren't in playoff contention, he's not worth a first.
Reply With Quote