Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka
Call it what you will, but there’s lots of positivity over the terms of this one year extension, and I’m simply questioning why this is. Understand that I am not questioning the idea of tacking on another year to his deal, just the cost ($30M) that it took to do this. I’m just asking what Brissett has done to merit this kind of contract. I don’t think it’s enough to say it’s a low end starter price, because it isn’t – we are theoretically giving him $27M-28M for one additional year.
|
I mean, I agree that Brissett hasn’t done anything to merit this type of money, but that’s not really why he’s getting it.
It’s more about not paying the backup more than the starter, and solidifying the spot for at least next year.