View Single Post
  #83  
Old 03-22-2019, 05:30 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,509
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,158 Times in 1,224 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Nobody is "hyperventilating" over cap space. What's silly is to adopt a free-wheeling spending attitude just because we have lots of cap space. That's a mistake, and to adopt a "I don't care whether this was money well spent because we have plenty of cap space" attitude is a short-term, poor strategy. The Colts just need to make smart moves, regardless of cap space.

I'm not even saying that this was necessarily a bad move in an of itself, merely that I was surprised by it and that I hope that it doesn't signal a change in the approach that has been working so well. However, comments like yours are troubling and all too common unfortunately.
You think it's troubling to be less than concerned about a 2 year deal that, even if fully guaranteed (it's not), means the difference between $120 million and $130 million in cap space in 2020? And that would be off the books after 2020? That seems a bit alarmist to me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (03-22-2019), VeveJones007 (03-24-2019)