View Single Post
  #11  
Old 03-22-2019, 04:51 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,654
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 4,893 Times in 1,998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Nobody is "hyperventilating" over cap space. What's silly is to adopt a free-wheeling spending attitude just because we have lots of cap space. That's a mistake, and to adopt a "I don't care whether this was money well spent because we have plenty of cap space" attitude is a short-term, poor strategy. The Colts just need to make smart moves, regardless of cap space.

I'm not even saying that this was necessarily a bad move in an of itself, merely that I was surprised by it and that I hope that it doesn't signal a change in the approach that has been working so well. However, comments like yours are troubling and all too common unfortunately.
It is short term. It’s a 2 year deal that doesn’t hurt us at all. We have 40 billion dollars in cap space
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (03-24-2019)