View Single Post
  #62  
Old 12-24-2018, 10:32 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,467
Thanks: 118
Thanked 2,116 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
You make a good point about the domino effect that adding Bell would have upon the entire roster of RBs, but can you explain why you disagree with items 1 and 2? Those are the ones that to me are most concerning.
1) Getting the same level of production out of two players as you previously did out of one player illustrates the one player's value to me rather than negating it. For example, if player A produces 16 sacks, then the next year players B and C produce 9 and 7 sacks each, that tells me that if I still had player A, then players A, B, and C would likely all be more effective.

2) Who cares? Even if he peaked at 25, a player's prime is longer than one year, and anyone who would be counting on Bell for more than 3-4 years is foolish.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote