Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610
The only convincing argument there is 4, and that could be mitigated with a clause in the contract. The Steelers would be better with Bell and they know it, otherwise they wouldn't be considering transition tagging him. So would the Colts. Remember, the upgrade by adding Bell isn't just Bell vs. Mack as #1, it's Mack vs. Hines/Wilkins as #2, plus all the creative things this offense could do putting Bell and Hines, Bell and Mack, or all 3 on the field at the same time. Plus if you want an upgrade at receiver, Bell is your best bet on the 2019 free agent market.
|
You make a good point about the domino effect that adding Bell would have upon the entire roster of RBs, but can you explain why you disagree with items 1 and 2? Those are the ones that to me are most concerning.